نوع مقاله : مقالۀ پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری معماری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد مشهد، ایران.
2 استادیار گروه معماری، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران
3 استاد گروه معماری، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
4 استادیار گروه معماری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Although the process study is modern, research into this field has left a rocky path behind that represents a variety of intellectual as well as theoretical practices governing it. Most of studies describe the experience of designing through an analytical and systematic approach. Indeed, they have tend to overlook thinking about designing. Such a systematic view causes to disregard the nature of process, while designing is considered as a method of thinking.
Despite the knowledge acquired by researchers, the process of design mainly employs logical reasoning to achieve its aims. The current research sets out to study how a logical reasoning works in the designing process and investigates metaphor as a reasoning way to develop architectural works.
It seeks to find out the proportion of analogy to metaphor that is viewed as a basic reasoning method in designing practices. In this research, the library method was used to collect data, and logical reasoning methods were also applied for the methodology.
Findings showed that analogy and metaphor, as the most common logical methods, have a quadruple framework and play a pivotal role in developing architectural works. Metaphor is a type of analogy which establishes authenticity in architectural works by retaining properties of analogy.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)