تبیین مدل فرایندمحور سازگاری ساکن و مسکن (مطالعۀ موردی: مسکن معاصر یزد)

نوع مقاله : مقالۀ پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار گروه معماری، دانشکدۀ هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

چکیده
بیان مسئله: سازگاری میان نیازهای انسان و محیط ساخته‌شده از فاکتورهای بسیار مهم در ارزیابی محیط زندگی مطلوب است؛ به همین دلیل پژوهش‌های بسیاری مفهوم سازگاری را مورد توجه قرار داده‌اند. با وجود مطالعات بسیاری که انجام شده است، هم‌چنان مدل نظری کاربردی برای مطالعة فرایند سازگاری در رابطة میان ساکن و مسکن وجود ندارد. بسیاری از پژوهش‌ها سازگاری را به‌عنوان برآیند و هدف یک رابطه می‌دانند و بر نتایج سازگاری و عدم سازگاری ساکن و مسکن متمرکز شده‌اند؛ اما فرایند سازگاری ساکن و مسکن موضوعی است که در پژوهش‌ها کم‌تر مورد توجه قرار گرفته است.
هدف پژوهش: پژوهش حاضر با طرح این سؤال که شیوة سازگاری انسان یزدی با مسکن معاصر چگونه است، در پی ارائة یک مدل نظری فرایندمحور برای مطالعة شیوة سازگاری ساکن و مسکن است.
روش پژوهش: رویکرد و راهبرد اصلی پژوهش کیفی است و تحلیل داده‌ها با روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی انجام شده است.
نتیجه‌گیری: نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد در مسکن میانی، افراد شیوه‌های فعال‌تری را برای ایجاد سازگاری میان خود و مسکن انتخاب می‌کنند، آن‌ها در مسکن دخل و تصرف می‌کنند یا رفتار خود در فضا و نحوة استفاده از فضاها را تغییر می‌دهند؛ اما در مسکن جدید ساکنین دخل و تصرف بسیار محدودی در مسکن انجام می‌دهند و به دلیل این‌که همین تقلای محدود نیز از جانب فضا بی‌پاسخ می‌ماند نسبت به فضا بی‌توجه می‌شوند و در صورتی‌که محدودیتی وجود نداشته باشد، از مسکن خود نقل مکان می‌کنند. تحلیل داده‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد، علاوه بر سه عامل مهم بستر، نیازهای ساکنین و قابلیت‌های مسکن؛ سن و نسل ساکنین، مشارکت در فرایند ساخت، الگوی مسکن، مدت زمان اقامت در مسکن، خاطرات و روابط با همسایگان بر شیوة سازگاری ساکن و مسکن تأثیر بسیار دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Process Oriented Model of Residential- Housing Congruence (Case Study: Contemporary Housing in Yazd)

نویسنده [English]

  • Elham Fallah
Assistant Professor, Faculty of Architecture, Collage of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
Problem statement: Assessing a desirable living environment hinges on the compatibility between human needs and the built environment, making it a crucial factor. Consequently, numerous studies have focused on the concept of compatibility. Despite extensive research, there is still no practical theoretical model for studying the compatibility process in the relationship between residents and their residences. Many studies have focused on the outcomes of compatibility and incompatibility between residents and housing, considering compatibility as both a consequence and a goal within the relationship. However, the compatibility process of residents to their residences is a topic that has received less attention in research.
Research objective: The primary aim of this study is to investigate how Yazdi individuals are compatible with contemporary housing. The ultimate goal is to develop a theoretical, process-oriented model for studying the compatibility of residents with their residences.
Research method: The research primarily employs a qualitative approach, and data analysis is conducted using qualitative content analysis.
Conclusion: The research findings indicate that individuals in middle housing adopt more active approaches in order to establish compatibility between themselves and their residences. They engage with the housing or modify their behavior in the space. However, in new housing, residents are less engaged with their residences, and due to the unresponsiveness of the space, they become indifferent to it. In the absence of restrictions, some even choose to relocate from their residences. Despite three critical factors, including the physical environment, residents’ needs, and housing capabilities, data analysis in the study shows that residents’ age and generation, participation in the construction process, housing patterns, length of stay in housing, memories, and relationships with neighbors all have a significant impact on how compatible residents are with their residences.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Resident
  • Housing
  • Compatibility
  • Yazd
  • Process-oriented
  • Theoretical model
بحرینی، سید حسین. (1391). تئوری شکل شهر. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
عینی‌فر، علی‌رضا. (1395). آفرینش نظریة معماری. تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.
Altaş, N. E. & Özsoy, A. (1998). Spatial adaptability and flexibility as parameters of user satisfaction for quality housing. Building and Environment, 33 (5), 315–323.
Amani, R., Etemadi, O., Fatehizadeh, M. & Bahrami, F. (2012). The Relationship of Attachment Styles and Social Adjustment. CPAP, 2 (6), 15-26
Ann Lodi, K. & Raedene Combs, E. (1989). Housing Adjustments of Rural Households: Decisions and Consequences. Housing and Society, 16 (3), 13–22.
Baum, S. & Hassan, R. (1999). Home owners, Home renovation and Residential Mobility. Journal of Sociology, 35 (1), 109–117.
Brown, J. & Moore, E. (1970). The Intra-Urban Migration Process: A Perspective. Geografiska Annler Series B, 52 (1), 1-13.
Campbell-Sills, L., Cohan, S. & Stein, M. (2005). Relationship of resilience to personality, coping, and psychiatric symptoms in young adults. Behaviour, Research and Therapy, 44 (4), 585-599.
Crull, S. R., Bode, M. E. & Morris, E. W. (1991). Two tests of the housing adjustment model of residential mobility. Housing and Society, 18 (3), 53–64.
De Groot, C., Mulder C. H. & Manting, D. (2011). Intentions to move and actual moving behaviour in the etherlands. Housing studies, 26 (3), 307- 328
Eichner, M. M. (1986). A model of household housing adjustment: confronting analytical issues. Unpublished doctoral dessertation. Ames: Iowa State University. https://doi.org/10.31274/rtd-180813-5769
Fattah, H. A., Salleh, A. G., Badarulzaman, N. & Ali, K. (2015). Factors Affecting Residential Mobility among Households in Penang, Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170, 516–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.077
Ferreira, F., Gyourko, J. & Tracy, J. (2010). Housing busts and household mobility. Journal ofUrban Economics, 68 (1), 34-45.
Festinger, L. (1962). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford. CA: Stanford University Press.
Fleury-bahi, G., Felonneau, M. L. & Marchand, D. (2008). Processes of Place. Environment and Behavior, 40 (5), 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507307461
French, J. R. P., Rodgers, W. & Cobb, S. (1974). Adjustment as person–environment fit. In G. V. Coelho, D. A. Hamburg,&J. E. Adams (Eds.), Coping and adaptation. New York: Basic Books.
Galster, G. C. & Hesser, G. W. (1981). Residential Satisfaction. Environment and Behavior, 13 (6), 735–758.
Gati, I., Fassa, N. & Mayer, Y. (1998). An Aspect-Based Approach to Person-Environment Fit: A Comparison between the Aspect Structure Derived from Characteristics of Occupations and That Derived from Counselees Preferences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 53 (1998), 28.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
Greenfield, E. A. & Russell, D. (2011). Identifying living arrangements that heighten risk for loneliness in later life: vidence from the U.S. national social life, health, and aging project [J]. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 30 (4), 524-534.
Helderman, A., Mulder, C., Clara H., & Ham, M. V. (2004). The changing effect of home ownership on residential mobility in the Netherlands, 1980–98. Housing Studies, 19 (4), 601-616.
Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Ittelson, W. H., Proshansky, H., Rivlin, L. & Winkel, G. (1974). An Introduction to Environmental Psychology. Holt: Rinehart and Winston.
Jusan, M. (2010). Means End Chain, Person Environment Congruence And Mass Housing Design. Open House International, 35 (3), 76–86.
Jusan, M. & Sulaiman, A. B. (2005). Personalization  as a sustainable approach to mass housing   conference proceeding of Sustainable Building South East Asia. Conducted by University of Technology Malaysia Institutional Repository, 11–13.
Kahana, E. (1982). A congruence model of person-environments interaction. in P.G. Windley and T.O Byerts, F.G. Ernst (Ed), Theory development in environment and aging.washington: Wiley.
Lang, J. (2007). Creating Architectural Theory. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Lawton, M. & Nahemow, L. (1973). Ecology and the aging process in C Eisdorfer and M P Lawton (eds.) Psychology of adult development and aging. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Lien, L. L. (2013). Person-Environment Fit and Adaptation: Exploring the Interaction between Person and Environment in Older Age. United States: Unpublished doctoral dissertation Oregon state university.
Lynch, K. (1981). Good city form. Massachusetts Institute of technology. Massachusetts institute of Technology. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.co.uk/Good-City-Form-K-Lynch/dp/0262620464
Moore, K. D. (2005). Using Place Rules and Affect to Understand Environmental Fit: A Theoretical Exploration. Environment and Behavior, 37 (3), 330–363.
Morris, E. W. & Winter, M. (1975). A Theory of Family Housing Adjustment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 37 (1), 79–88.
Mridha, M. (2015). Living in an apartment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 42–54.
Musiol, A. & Boehnke, K. (2013). Person-Environment Value Congruence and Satisfaction with Life. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3 (9), 57–65.
Omar, E. O., Endut, E. & Saruwono, M. (2012). Personalisation of the Home. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 49, 328–340.
Parrott, K. (1985). Critical factors affecting consumer satisfaction with the home remodeling process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.
Pickvance, C. (1973). Lifecycle, housing tenure and intra-urban mobility: a causal model. The Sociological Review, (1973), 29–50.
Popenoe, D. (1977). The Suburbun Environment: Sweden and the United States. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Priemus, H. (1986). Housing As a Social Adaptation Process: A Conceptual Scheme. Environment and Behavior, 18 (1), 31–52.
Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K. & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3 (1), 57–83.
Riemer, S. (1943). Sociological Theory Of Home Adjustment. American Sociological Review, 8 (3), 272–278.
Rossi, P. (1955). Why Families Move: A Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility Glencoe. Glencoe: The Free Press.
Shin, J. (2016). Toward a theory of environmental satisfaction and human comfort: A process-oriented and contextually sensitive theoretical framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 11–21.
Spokane, A. R., Meir, E. I. & Catalano, M. (2000). Person–Environment Congruence and Holland’s Theory: A Review and Reconsideration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57 (2), 137–187.
Steggell, C. D., Binder, S. K., Davidson, L. A., Vega, P. R., Hutton, E. D. & Rodecap, A. R. (2003). Exploring Theories of Human Behavior in Housing Research. Housing and Society, 30 (1), 3–32.
Tavassoli, M. (2022). Urban structure and architecture in the hot arid Zone of Iran. Tehran: payam.
Tinsley, H. E. A. (2000). The Congruence Myth: An Analysis of the Efficacy of the Person–Environment Fit Model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56 (2), 147–179.
Wagnild, G. (2001). Growing old at home. Journal of Housing for the Eldery, 14 (1/2), 71-84.
Wahl, H. W. & Lang, F. R. (2003). Aging in context across the adult life course. Integrating physical and social environmental research.23(1).
Wicker, A. W. (1984). An introduction to ecological psychology. London: Cambridge University Press.
Winkel, G., Saegert, S. & Evans, G. W. (2009). An ecological perspective on theory, methods, and analysis in environmental psychology: Advances and challenges. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29 (3), 318–328.