The Evolution of Housing Spatial Organization Based on the Social Status of Women (A Comparative Analogy of Iranian and European Housing)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Master of Architecture Researcher, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Iran.

Abstract

Abstract
Problem Statement: There has always been an interaction between the spatial structure of the house and social and cultural factors. Women and their new positions at home and in society have been influential factors in house structure changes in the last few centuries. As a place that plays a crucial role in identifying and reproducing social values, the house has always changed to express and harmonize with the residents’ beliefs. Since today the trend of changes in women’s roles and social identity is changing rapidly, examining the developments in the past few centuries, identifying the influential factors, strategies applied, and the results of these changes can be an excellent way to predict and present patterns suitable for the house in the future.
Research objective: The purpose of this article is to compare the spatial structure between the houses of the 17th to 21st century in Europe with the houses of Iran from the Qajar period until now by focusing on the social status of women. For this purpose, the evolution of spatial organization in Iran and Europe was examined separately then the differences and similarities between them in the same period were scrutinized.
Research method: This study employed the interpretive-historical method, logical reasoning, and comparative analogy to investigate the relationship and the two-way effects of the spatial structure of the house and the social position of women by using the longitudinal and transverse analogy.
Conclusion: The results show that there is a direct relationship between women’s social status improvement and the composition of the gender domains of the home. With the improvement of this position, the spatial quality of feminine territories has increased, and many gender valuations of spaces and functions have been eliminated, which has finally led to the balancing of gender roles in the home.

Keywords

References

Ahrentzen, S., Levine, D. W. & Michelson, W. (1989). Space, time, and activity in the home: A gender analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9(2), 89-101.
Akoochekian, Z., Yazdanfar, A. & Sahragard Monfared, N. (2022). Identifying the model of women social sustainability in the context of housing design. Social Life Cycle Assessment International Conference (S-LCA 2022),  Aachen, Germany.
Alasvand, F. (2009). Naghsh-ha-ye jensiat-i [Gender roles; Gender Identity and Roles]. Tehran: Presidential Office, Centre for Women and Family Affairs.
Amole, D. (2012). Gender differences in user responses to students’ housing. Procedia-social and Behavioral Sciences, (38), 89-99.
Armaghan, M., Soltanzadeh, H. & Irani Behbahani, H. (2015). Redefining women’s role in the family and its impact on the painting decoration and structure of aristocratic houses in Tehran during the Qajar era. Bagh-e Nazar, (34), 11-24.
Azad-Armaki, M. (2014). Apartemen neshini va ashpazkane dar Iran [Living in Apartment and kitchen in Iran]. Cultural Studies and Communication, (31), 0-63.
Bahrami Broomand, M. & Esfandiari, Z. (2018). The Symbolic Meaning of Spaces and Gender Messages: Women’s Social Exclusion. Haft Shahr, 4(61), 94-107.
Fisher, H. (2002). First Genus (N. Safarianpour, Trans.). Tehran: Zaryab Publications.
Gorman-Murray, A. (2008). Masculinity and the home: a critical review and conceptual framework. Australian Geographer, 39(3), 367-379.
Havenband, L. K. (2002). Looking through the lens of gender: A postmodern critique of a modern housing paradigm. Journal of Interior Design, 28(2), 1-14.
Heynen, H. (Ed.). (2005). Modernity and domesticity: tensions and contradictions؛ Negotiating domesticity: spatial productions of gender in modern architecture. London: Routledge.
Jalili, T. & Akbari, S. (2016). Baresi-ye Tahavolat-e Pelan-e Maskouni az Dore-ye Qajar ta Pahlavi-ye Dovom [Investigating the evolution of residential plans from the Qajar era to the second Pahlavi era]. The first annual conference on architecture, urban planning, and urban management research. International Institute of Architecture, Mehraz Shahr Urbanization, Mashhad.
Johnson, M. H. (2003). Housing culture: traditional architecture in an English landscape. London: Routledge.
Johnson, M. H. (2015). 3 English Houses, Materiality, and Everyday Life. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 26(1), 27-39.
Kami Shirazi, S. M., Sultanzadeh, H. & Habib, F. (2018). The Impact of lifestyle on Spatial Organization of Residential Architecture in Iran (Case study: Kitchen between Years 1304-1357 SH). Women’s Studies, (2), 33-70.
Kwon, H. A. & Kim, S. (2017). Variation in the characteristics of everyday life and meaning of urban housing due to the transition of social structure: Focusing on articles published in lifestyle magazines. Sustainability, 9(8), 1298.
Lang, J. T. (2009). Architecture for human behaviour: the nature of problem. (A. Einifar, Trans.). Tehran: Tehran University Press.
Lofthouse, P. B. (2012). The development of the English semi-detached house: 1750-1950. Unpublished PhD Thesis.  Department of Archaeology, University of York, England.
Mallett, S. (2004). Understanding home: a critical review of the literature. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 62-89.
Manum, B. (2006). Apartment layouts and domestic life: the interior space and its usability: a study of Norwegian apartments built in the period 1930-2005. Oslo: The Oslo School of Architecture and Design.
Miller, L. (Ed.) (2005). Denatured domesticity: an account of femininity and physiognomy in the interiors of Frances Glessner Lee؛ Negotiating domesticity: spatial productions of gender in modern architecture. London: Routledge.
Mirjani, H. (2006). Logical Argumentation as a Research Method. Soffeh, (50), 35-0.
Monfared, N. S. S. & Yazdanfar, S. A. (2015). Model of Perceptional Concepts and Related Physical Principles for Participatory Local Center: Chizar local community in Tehran as a case study. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, (170), 78-88.
Roberts, M. (1990). Gender and housing: the impact of design. Built Environment, (170), 257-268.
Saei, M. (2009). Ravesh tahghigh tarikhi: shiveha va karbordhaye an dar ertebatat [Historical research method: its methods and applications in communication]. Resaneh, (1), 0-167.
Segalen, M. (1991). Historical sociology of the family (H. Eliyasi, Trans.). Tehran: Markaz.
Serajzadeh, H. & Javaheri, F. (2007). Barabari gerae jensiati dar mian daneshjooyan va moteghayerhaye zaminei va negareshi mortabet ba an [Gender egalitarianism among students and contextual and attitudinal variables related to it]. Iranian Journal of Sociology, 7(2), 3-40.
Shayegan, F. & Rostami, F. (2012). Social Identity and Sense of Security (Case study: Tehran Women). Social Development and Welfare Planning, (9), 151.
Singleton, A. & Maher, J. (2004) The ‘‘New Man’’ is in the house: young men, social change, and housework. Journal of Men’s Studies, (12), 227-240.
Tabatabaei, N. & Orangnia, Sh. (2016). Baresi naghsh ergonomy dar tarahi ashpazkhanehaye modern karbari maskouni [Examining the role of ergonomics in the design of modern kitchens for residential use]. The first competition of the comprehensive international conference of engineering sciences in Iran. Gilan University, Bandar Anzali.
Varmaghani, H. & Soltanzadeh, H. (2015). The Role of Gender and Livelihood Culture in Forming House (Comparing the Qajar’ s Houses of Gilan and Bushehr). Armanshahr, 23(11), 123-134.‎
Vestbro, D. U. & Horelli, L. (2012). Design for gender equality: The history of co-housing ideas and realities. Built Environment, 38(3), 315-335.
Zibaeinejad, M. (2010). Tafavot-ha, hoviat va naghsh-ha-ye jensiat-i [differences, identity, and gender roles]. Tehran: Presidential Office, Center for Women and Family Affairs.
The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar
Volume 20, Issue 124
October 2023
Pages 67-82

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics