Towards a Democratic Process in Urban Planning and Design; Assessing the Status of Citizens’ Involvement in Urban Plans and Projects in Iran

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Urban Planning, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

2 Master of Urban Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

Abstract

Abstract
Problem Statement: it seems that in current times, many of the urban designs and plans in Iran have totalitarian, centralized, and monopolistic essences. This condition is predictably originated from the absence of deliberative and collaborative democracies; in light of the foregoing, the inefficiencies of the stages of presentation and implementation have led to neglecting the citizenship rights and the public preferences. Hence, citizens have little social responsibilities for the negative consequences of inefficient urban practices. In addition, an appropriate context is not provided for them to affect the various steps of urban processes, claiming their rights to the city, and expressing their opinions. In this spirit, the urban projects lose their basic figures in providing stability and promoting the role of people in urban development and management. Hence, the impetus behind this study is to improve the urban democracy in the process of urban planning and design.
Purpose: this study attempts to investigate the reasons for the lack of democratic involvement by the citizens in the process of urban development and management, as well as to find some solutions to remove this widespread deep-rooted social dilemma.
Research hypothesis: the realization of democracy and actual participation of citizens in the process of developing the urban spaces can lead to more accurate and efficient decision makings, as well as more successful implementation of urban plans and projects.
Research method: this article was conducted through content analysis and comparative methods. While studying the pillars of the democratic system, the methods of democratic participation of citizens in the processes of urban development and management in Iran was studied regarding the Principles of the Critical Theory. In fact, an effort was made to provide a platform for presenting the findings and suggested solutions through the process of criticizing and analysing the current situation of the Iranian urban plans and designs along with comparing them with the necessary elements for the realization of democratic and people-friendly urban processes. This should be stated that the data collection method was based on interviews with people, studying documents, and also field observations.
Conclusion: results indicate that Dilemmas in the Iranian urban system have been originated from the non-democratic factors, such as the lack of participation, the lack of all-inclusiveness, the violation of citizenship rights and urban justice, illegitimate urban laws, inflexibility, the downfall of pluralism, and etc. Hence, through scheming criteria such as the diversity of opinions, all-inclusiveness, flexibility, forming NGOs, the citizen education and discourse, diversity and respecting the citizen’s rights, etc., these processes can be democratized and also a platform for the emergence of a comprehensive type of a democratic urban planning and design would be materialized; a process which strengthens the urban democracy and honors the position of people, not as the problem but as the solution, by creating equal opportunities in a disinterested fashion.

Keywords


Appleyard, D. (1979). Planning the pluralist city. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Atlee, T. (2003). The tao of democracy: using co-intelligence to create a world that works for all. Cranston, RI: The Writers Collective.
Bacon, E. (2012). Tarāhi-ye šahrhā [Design of cities] (F. Taheri, Trans.). Tehran: Shahidi Publication.
Bahrainy, H. & Aminzadeh, B. (2007). Evaluation of Navab regeneration project in central Tehran, Iran. International Journal of Environmental Research, 1(2), 114-127.
Barzegaran, M., & Daroudi, M. R. (2015). Assessment of Mehr housing project as an example of housing for low-income people in Iran. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 12(1), 70-74.
Bashiriyeh, H. (2013). Dars-hā-ye demokrāci barāye hame [Lessons on democracy for everyone]. Tehran: Negah-e Moaser Publication.
Behzadfar, M. & Mahmoudi Kurdistani, P. (2010). Hanjārhā-ye keyfi-ye tarāhi-ye fazā-ye šahri-ye mardom-madār (āzādi-madār) [Qualitative norms of people-oriented urban spaces design (freedom-oriented)]. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 2(3), 32-48.
Behzadfar, M. (2013). Tarh-hā-o barnāme-hā-ye šahrsāzi [Designs and plans in urban development]. Tehran: Shahr Publication.
Bentley, I., Alcock, A., Murrain, P., McGlynn, S. & Smith, G. (2012). Mohit-hāye pāsoxdeh: ketāb-e rāhnamā-ye tarāhān [Responsive environments: a manual for designers] (M. Behzadfar, Trans.). Tehran: Iran University of Science and Technology Press.
Bickford, S. (2000). Constructing inequality: city spaces and the architecture of citizenship. Political Theory, 28(3), 355-376.
Brain, D. (2006). Democracy and urban design: the transect as civic renewal. Places Journal, 18(1), 17-23.
Fainstein, S. (2014). The just city. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 18(1), 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2013.834643
Francis, M. (1987). The making of democratic streets. In A.V. Moudon (Ed.), Public streets for public use. New York: Columbia University Press.
Griffin, T. L., Cohen, A. & Maddox, D. (2015). The just city essays: 26 vision for urban equity, inclusion and opportunity (Volume 1 of The Just City Essays Series). Independent Publisher. Available at: https://www.thenatureofcities.com/the-just-city-essays
Habermas, J. (2001). The postnational constellation: political essays (M. Pensky, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (2013). Nazariye-ye koneš-e ertebāti [The theory of communicative action] (K. Pooladi, Trans.). Tehran: Markaz.
Habibi, M. (2000). Jāme'e-ye madani-o hayāt-e šahri [Civil society and urban life]. Honar-Ha-Ye-Ziba, 7, 21-33.
Hamdi, N. (2004). Small change; about the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. London: Earthscan.
Hamdi, N. (2010). The placemaker’s guide to building community. London: Earthscan.
Harvey, D. & Merrifield, A. (2012). Right to the city: the urban roots of the financial crisis (K. Kalantari, Trans.). Tehran: Mehr-e Vista Publication.
Haughton, G. & Hunter, C. (2005). Sustainable cities. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House Publication, Inc.
Jacobs, A. & Appleyard, D. (1982). Towards an urban design manifesto. UC Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, Working No. 385. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/35v0b85k#author
Jahanbegloo, R. (2007). Conversations with Isaiah Berlin. Halban Publishers.
Kamrava, M. A. (2013). Šahrsāzi-ye moe'āser-e Irān [Contemporary town planning in Iran]. Tehran: University of Tehran Press.
Kant, I. (2000). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer, & A.W. Wood, Trans.). London: Cambridge University Press.
Kapeller, J. & Pühringer, S. (2012). Democracy in liberalism and neoliberalism: the case of Popper and Hayek. No: 10. ICAE working paper series. Linz, Austria: JKU Press.
Khademalhosini, A. & Arefipour, S. (2012). Šahrsāzi-ye mošārekati-o jāygāh-e mardom dar barnāmerizi-ye šahri, nemune-ye moredi: mantaqe-ye šeš-e esfahān [Participatory urban planning and position of people in urban planning, case study: region six Esfahan]. Journal of Human Settlements Planning, 7(19), 108-123.
Khalili, A., Noorollahi, H., Rashidi, N. & Rahmani, M. (2015). Arzyābi-ye siyāsat-hāye maskan-e mehr dar Irān-o erā’e-ye rāhkār-hāyi barāye behbud-e ān [Evaluation of Mehr housing policies in Iran and presentation of solutions for their improvement]. Journal of Urban Studies, 4(13), 83-92.
King, L. A. (2004). Democracy and city life. Journal of Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 3(1), 97-124.
Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on cities (E. Kofman, & E. Lebas, Trans and Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Lerner, D. (1958). The passing of traditional society: modernizing Middle East. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
Lynch, K. (2011). A theory of good city form (S. H. Bahrainy, Trans.). Tehran: University of Tehran Press.
Maghsoodi Tilaki, M. J., Azizi, B., Aldrin, A. & Hedayati Marzbali, M. (2014). Improving the preparation of Iranian urban development plans: lessons learned from other experiences. Modern Applied Science, 8(4), 144-157.
Mahmoudi Kurdistani, P., Khodabakhsh, P. & Mashayekhi, S. (2012). Democratic urban streets design guideline codifications. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 5(8), 71-82.
Mäntysalo, R. (2004). Approaches to participation in urban planning theories. Brozzi and Le Piagge Neighbourhoods: Rehabilitation of Suburban Areas: Diploma Workshop in Florence, 2004/05.
Miraftab, F. (2012). Planning and citizenship (R. Weber & R. Crane, Eds.). Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning, Chapter 38: 1180-1204. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mitchell, D. (2003). The right to the city: social justice and the fight for public space. New York: Guildford
Pirzadeh, H. (2008). Eslāh-e nezām-e modiriyyat-e tose'e-ye šahri dar Irān bar asās-e ruykard-e rāhbordi [The city development management correction based on strategic approach]. Tehran: Department of Urban Development and Architecture, Ministry of Housing and Urban Development.
Popper, K. (2001). The open society and its enemies (E. Fouladvand, Trans.). Tehran: Kharazmi Publication.
Purcell, M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: the right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58(2-3), 99-108.
Purcell, M. (2003). Citizenship and the right to the global city: reimagining the capitalist world order. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(3), 564-590.
Purcell, M. (2013). Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), 141-154.
Purcell, M. (2016). For democracy: planning and publics without the state. Planning Theory, 15(4), 386-401.
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness; a restatement (E. Kelly, Ed.). London: Harvard University Press.
Rowe, C. & Koetter, F. (1978). Collage city. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sanoff. H. (2007). Community based design learning: democracy and collective decision making. In A.M. Salama, & N. Wilkinson (Ed.) Design studio pedagogy: Horizons for the future (pp. 21-38). Gateshead, UK: Urban International Press.
Sanoff, H. (2008). Multiple views of participatory design. International Journal of Architectural Research, 2(1), 57-69.
Sanoff, H. (2010). Democratic design: participation case studies in urban and small town environments. Düsseldorf, Germany: Verlag-Muller.
Shamai, A., Fakhripour Mohammadi, A., Zanganeh, A. & Parizadi, T. (2016). Arzyābi-ye rezāyatmandi-ye šahrvandān az amalkard-e zir-gozarhā dar Tehrān; motāle'e-ye moredi: porože-ye zirgozar-e čahār-rāh-e vali-e asr-e šahr-e Tehrān [Citizens’ satisfaction with the performance of subways in Tehran; case study: the project underpass intersection in Tehran's Valiasr]. Urban Management Studies, 8(27), 42-53.
Soja, E. W. (1996). Thirdspace: journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Soja, E. W. (2010). Seeking spatial justice. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Sullivan, R. J. (2001). An Introduction to Kant’s Ethics (E. Fouladvand, Trans.). Tehran: Tarh-e Nov Publication.
Tavakolinia, J., Raeisi, H. & Aghaei, P. (2015). Sanješ-e mizān-e kārāyi-ye zir-gozarhāye šahri dar rāstāye pāydāri (Mored-e pažuheshi: zir-gozar-e čahār-rāh-e vali-e asr, Tehrān) [Measuring the quality of urban underpass performance to reach sustainability (case study: Valiasr underpass intersection, Tehran)]. Urban Management Studies, 7(21), 22-34.
Tibbalds, F. (2008). Making people-friendly towns: improving the public environment in towns and cities (M. Ahmadinejad, Trans). Isfahan: Khak Publication.
Wates, N. (2000). The community planning handbook; how people can shape their cities, towns and villages in any part of the world. London: Earthscan.
Wates, N. (2008). The community planning event manual; how to use collaborative planning and urban design events to improve your environment. London: Earthscan.