Spaciousness and body awareness: rereading the concept of space in architectural experience Case study: Tehran Museum of Contemporary Art

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Ph.D Candidate, Department of Architecture, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran

2 Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, College of fine arts, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Lahijan Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Statement of the problem: The variety of space-place experiences can be regarded as a feature that differentiates modern men from traditional men. Man’s existence across natural and social realms, not only has a theoretical and epistemological history but also various distinctive perceptions of experiencing natural and social places. Throughout history, distinctive perceptions have had a unique spirit on one hand and a common spirit in human body on the other. Nevertheless, body and its corporeal and physical characteristics have not been given their due attention in dominant architectural discourses. Body has always been considered a passive object.
Purpose: The present study aims to investigate bodily perception as a source of inspiration for redefining the concept of space in architectural experience. The secondary purposes of the study include examining the manifestations of reading space by incorporating bodily perceptions, as well as scrutinizing the integration of human senses in space perception.
Methodology: The current study is qualitative and uses a hermeneutic phenomenological philosophical approach. The study is “interpretive” in terms of research “purpose”, and aims to produce new insights so as to use the findings to improve the existing knowledge about the topic of interest. Hence, the “results” are “pure”. The “logic” of the study is “inductive.” In the present study, a deep interview was conducted to infer and extract the “subconscious” from the responses of interviewees. The data analysis method includes qualitative content analysis via open and axial coding.
Conclusion: The results suggest that phenomenal reading of spatial perception experience can be categorized into three levels of complete perception, dynamic perception of space through senses; space as a medium for perceiving collective nostalgia, and space as the possibility of intuition and perception of the other.

Keywords

References

• Akbari, A. (2016). Body, Space Perception and Place Construction. Retrieved from: http://anthropology.ir/article/31599.html
• Amiri, F. (2014). A Brief Overview of Christian Norberg Schulz‘s and Juhani Pallasmaa’s Phenomenology in Architecture. 1st International Congress on New Horizons in Architecture and Planning. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University.
• Bani Masoud, A. (2011). Memari-ye Moaser-e Iran dar Takapoo-ye beyn-e Sonnat va Moderinte [Iranian Contemporary Architecture and the Conflict between Tradition and Modernity]. Tehran: Honar-e Memari-ye Gharn.
• Bokharaee, S. (2015). Fazamandi: Vojooh, Hodood va Avamel-e Tasirgozar [Spatiality: dimensions, limits and influencing factors]. Soffeh, 25(69), 5-18.
• Pallasmaa, J. (2016). The thinking hand: existential and embodied wisdom in architecture (A. Akbari, Trans.). Tehran: Parham Naghsh.
• Daem, M. & Jozpiri, A. R. (2016). Creating Architectural Space in Iranian Civilization with a Phenomenological Approach. 2nd International Conference of Civil Architecture and Urban Planning at the beginning of the third millennium. Tehran: Solva Nasr Cultural Institute.
• Khabbazi Kenari, M. & Sebti, S. (2016). “Embodiment” in phenomenology of Husserl, Merleau-Ponty and Levinas. Hekmat va Falsafeh, 12(3), 75-97.
• Sohangir, S. & Nasir Salami, M. R. (2014). The patterns of creating space in architecture relying on theoretical paradigms
of postmodernism. Bagh-e Nazar, 11(28), 65-78.
• Carmen, T. (2011). Merleau-Ponty (M. Oliya, Trans.). Tehran: Qoqnoos.
• Mathews, E. (2008). Merleau-Ponty: A guide for the perplexed (R. Barkhordari, Trans.). Tehran: Gam-e No Publications.
• Mortazavi, Sh. (1988). Environmental Psychology. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University Press.
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). World of Perception (F. Jaber-Alansar, Trans.). Tehran: Qoqnoos.
• Mahdalickova, E. (2015). In search of new experiences of the body through space: The new issues in the relationship between subject and space (M. Parsa, Trans.). Ettelaat-e Hekmat va Marefat, 10(6), 38-41.
• Norouz Borazjani, V. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology. Tehran: Yadavaran.
• Norouz Borazjani, V. & Javadi, M. R. (2016). Bazyabiye Sazman-e Fazaei-ye Bagh-shahr-e Safavi-ye Qazvin az Manzar-e Padidarshenasi-ye Hermneutic [Studying the Space Organization of the Safavid City Garden in Qazvin According to a Hermeneutic Phenomenological Perspective]. Tehran: Yadavaran.
• De Vignemont, F. (2014). Bodily awareness. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (M. Khodadadi, Trans.). Tehran: Qoqnoos.
• Husserl, E. (2002). Cartesian Meditations (A. Rashidian, Trans.). Tehran: Ney.
• Yazdanian, A. & Dadashpoor, H. (2017). The Problem of Presence in Space: Awareness and Spatial Agency. Arid Regions Geographic Studies, 7(26), 73-91.
• Akhtar, Sh. (2010). The Paradox of Nature: Merleau-Ponty’s SemiNaturalistic, Critique of Husserlian Phenomenology (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Marquette-University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
• Benson, C. (2002). The Cultural Psychology of Self: Place, Morality and Art in Human Worlds. London: Routledge.
• Bigagli, F. (2010). And Who Art Thou, Boy? Face-to-Face with Bartleby; or Levinas and the Other. Journal of Leviathan, 12(3), 37-53.
• Catelli, S. L. (2007). Merleau-Ponty and Environmental Philosophy: Dwelling on the Landscapes of Thought. New York: State University of New York Press.
• Casey, E. S. (2012). Remembering: A Phenomenological Study. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
• Dodd, J. (2017). Phenomenology, Architecture and the Built World: Exercises in Philosophical Anthropology. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
• Gallagher, S. (2005). How the Body Shapes the Mind? Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and Time. New York: State University of New York Press.
• Kapoor, A. (2001). Taratantara, Actar/Balric.
• Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and Infinity. (A. Lingis, Trans.). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Duquesne University Press.
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (2005). Phenomenology of Perception. (C. Smith, Trans.). London: Routledge.
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la Perception. Paris: Gallimard.
• Shirazi, M. R. (2016). Architectural Theory and Practice, and the Question of Phenomenology: The Contribution of Tadao Ando to the Phenomenological Discourse. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). BTU Cottbus, Brandenburg.
• Snodgrass, A. & Coyne, R. (2013). Interpretation in Architecture: Design as a Way of Thinking. London: Routledge.
• Tymieniecka, A. T. (Ed.). (2013). Phenomenology of Space and Time: The Forces of the Cosmos and the Ontopoietic Genesis of Life. New York: Springer.
The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar
Volume 16, Issue 75
September 2019
Pages 71-82

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics