Conception of place for architects and non-architects

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Abstract

Nowadays discussion about different conceptions of place and how it is perceived by users of the place is an important debate in architecture and urbanism, especially in the area of behavioral sciences. In this vein, one of the most important concepts associated with this area especially in the discussions about environmental psychology is the conception of place. By recognizing different conceptions of place, its formation process and also parameters contributing to the perception of people of place, it is possible to create a desirable environment, which is the ultimate goal of architecture and urbanism. The main thrust of the present study was to extract and measure the factors contributing to the conception of architects and non-architects of place and the distinction between the two through a place narrative analysis. This was accomplished by a case study carried out in two main bus stations located in Isfahan. For this purpose, two concepts namely "thinking content" and "thinking modes" were separately investigated and compared for architects and non-architects, using closed and open questionnaires and in-depth interviews with people in two terminals (i.e., Kaveh and Soffeh) in Isfahan. The sample was 174 people. Out of this sample, 100 were non-architects and 74 were architects.  The results were indicative of the fact that both architects and non-architects consider individual factors as relevant to the formation of conception of meaning. However, according to non-architects, individual factors are more relevant to individual needs and to the degree to which these needs are met, given the facilities in the environment whereas architects express individual factors in terms of recognition of behavioral patterns and also the existing conditions and quality in the environment. In terms of thinking mode, the findings indicate that non-architects have an emotional, empirical or relative thinking towards place and the conceptions in it, but architects have abstract and conceptual thinking in understanding place conceptions.

Keywords

References

Alexander, C. (1979). The Timeless Way of Building. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
Amdu, L., & Epstein-Pliouchtch, M. (2009). Architects’ Places, Users’ Places: Place Meanings at the New Central Bus Station, Tel Aviv. Journal of Urban Design, 14(2): 147-161
Bell, J. S. (2002). Narrative Inquiry: More Than Just Telling Stories. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2): 207-213.
Berdoulay, V. (1989). Place, meaning and discourse in French language geography. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Bonta, J. P. (1979). Architecture and its Interpretation: A study of expressive system in Architecture. London: Lund Humphries.
Canter, D. (1977). The Psychology of Place. London: Architectural Press.
Cheng, A. S., & Daniels, S. E. (2003). Examining the interaction between geographic scale andways of knowing in ecosystem management: a case study of placebased collaborative planning. Forest Science, (49): 841-85.
Childress, H. (1994). Place, narrative, and relationship: a new approach to place attachment. Conference Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Environmental Design Research Association. San Antonio: Texas.
Creswell , J. W., & Planto Clarrk, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (secound ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Cuba, L., & Hummon, D. M. (1993). A place to call home: identification with dwelling, community, region. The Sociological Quartery, (34): 111-131.
Dehkordi, A.m. (2012). In traduce plans and models in mixture research methodology. Journal of Rahbord, 20 (60): 140-151.
Ghasemzadeh, M. (2011). The main Position of room in dwelling design. Journal of Honar- Ha- Ye- Ziba, (41): 16-5.
Gustafson, P. E. R. (2001). Meanings of Place: Every day Experience and Theoretical Conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21 (1): 5-16.
Lynch, k. (2009). A Theory of Good City Form, Translated from the persian by Bahraini. H. Tehran: Tehran University. (Original work published in 1981).
Lang. j. (2002). Creation architectural theory, Translated from the persian by Einifar, A. R. Tehran: Tehran University. (Original work published in 1967).
Manzo, L. C. (2005). For better or worse: Exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1): 67-86.
Massey, D. (1994). Space, Place and Gender. Cambridge: Polity.
Meesters, J. (2009). The Meaning of Activities in the Dwelling and Residential Environment. Doctoral Thesis. Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
Motlabi. Gh. (2002). Environment psychology, a new knowledge in service of architecture and urban design. Journal of Honar- Ha- Ye- Ziba, (25): 55-64.
Rapoport, A. (1982). The meaning of the built environment: a nonverbal communication approach. Arizona: University of Arizona Press.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion.
Schulz, C.N. (1980). Genius Loci, Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. New York: Rizzoli
Sennett, R. (1990). The Conscience of the Eye The Design and Social Life of Cities. NewYork: W.W. Norton & Company.
Sime, J. D. (1986). Creating places or designing spaces? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6(1): 49-63.
Sixmith, J. (1986). The Meaning of Home: An Exploratory Study of Environmental Experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, (6): 281-298.
Stedman, R. C. (2002). Towards a social psichology of place: predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude and identity. Journal of environment and psychology, (34): 561-581.
Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and Place: The Perspective of Experience. London: Edward Arnold.
Tuan, Y. F. (2001). Space and place: The perspective of Experience. Minnea Polis: University of Minnesota press.
The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar
Volume 13, Issue 43
January 2017
Pages 117-128

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics