Power and Resistance in the Representation of Woman in the Paintings of Association of Iranian Painter’s (AIP) members

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Abstract

Two major different approaches have been considered for "power". One of them is an oriented approach with a direction from the top towards down, in which the subject of power is applying factor on the object of power; in contrast the other one is the Foucault’s approach of "power" which lacks direction and the matter can be either subject or object at one time. In this approach, it is possible to resist against power and this kind of power is forming human life. Several tools can be used in the exercise of power, especially in gender power. One of the most important tools is "the look". The Gaze theories which investigate the ways of male’s power exercising especially on the female figure by peruse of the gaze, particularly the voyeuristic male gaze, develop a  way to the expression of power in the visual arts. In present study, the main aim is to answer the manner in which the power is exerted in representation of women in paintings, and to seek how a woman is represented as a power agent and the relation of the look of the figure to the audience. The hypothesis, is that the artist resists against the dominance of the governmental supervising institution, but on the other hand due to the cultural and religious reasons, by using visual techniques the woman is abstained of being the subject of the gender power stereotypes. The relationship between the use of visual elements, the look, power and resistance has been investigated by studying the gaze types. Hence, by using library-mining and choosing samples from the paintings of the members of Association of Iranian Painters and considering the gaze theory the works which has depicted woman’s figure have been analyzed. The statistics were analyzed by IBM SPSS software, and results have discussed according to the Foucault’s approach of power. The results show that the represented woman is not considered as passive and dominated being by the artist. It means, the woman is not the subject of the action of looking. This is aligned with proposed resistance by Foucault. The returned look, particularly the gaze to the viewer, makes woman as the agent of power. The artist uses all the factors and basics of visual arts, strictly the woman is placed in level eye angle which means the equal power position with the artist and the viewer; but the relation between artist and audience is a common kind of power. The audience has no opportunity to exercise power over artist and the artist guides him/her how to look by technical skills. Cultural exclusions that are affected by social and religious culture of artist have more effects on hedonistic intuitive feelings and led the artist to be in accordance with the cultural, social and  political power which monitors the activities of AIP. Showing naked women to be the subject of voyeuristic gaze is  refused but his propensity of representing woman without hijab is not ignored.

Keywords


Argyle, M. (1975). Bodily Communication. Revised edition. NewYork: Routledge.
Association of Iranian Painters (AIP). (2014-2015). Available From: http:// www.iranpainters.com/sn/members/lang/fa (Accessed 1 September 2014)
Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. Revised edition. London Penguin, Books Limited.
Chandler, D. (1998). Notes on the Gaze. Available from: http://www.visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/gaze (Accessed 25 September 2014)
Coward, R. (2001). The look in Reading Images, Readers in cultural criticism. NewYork: Palgrave.
Evans, C. & Gamman, L. (2005). The Gaze Revisited, or Reviewing Queer Viewing in A Queer Romance: Lesbians, Gay Men, and Popular Culture. Editors: Burston, P. & Burston, N. Richardson, C. London & NewYork: Routledge.
Foucault, M. Faubion, J. D. (2000). The subject and Power in Power. Translated from French by Hurley, R., et al. NewYork: New Press.
Ghahramani, M. (2014). Tarjomeh va tahlil- e enteghadi gofteman: roykard– e neshaneh shenakhti [Translation and critical discourse analysis: semiotics approach]. 2nd edition. Tehran: Elm.
Glancy, J. A. (1995). The accused: Susanna and her Readers in Feminist Companion to Esther. Judith, and Susanna. Editor: Brenner, A. UK: A&C Black.
Hafeznia, M. R. (2007). Moghadame- ei bar ravesh tahghigh dar oolom ensani [An Introduction to the Research method in Humanities]. Tehran: Samt.
Korsmeyer, C. (2004). Gender and Aesthetics: An Introduction. NewYork: Routledge.
Lutz, C. & Collins, J. (1994). The Photograph as an Intersection of Gazes: The Example of National Geographic. In Visualizing Theory. Edited by Taylor, L. NewYork: Routledge.
Mast, G. & Cohen, M. (1985). Film theory and criticism: introductory readings. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
McQuillan, M. (Editor). (2000). The Narrative Reader. London and NewYork: Routledge.
Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. Screen (Oxford Journals), 16 (3): 6–18.
Ravadrad, A. Moridi, M. Taghizadegan, M. (2010). Tahlili bar baznamae- ye zan dar naghashi- ye moaser- e Iran [Analyzing Women’s Representation in Contemporary Iranian Painting]. Pajohesh Zanan, 8(1): 125-141.
Roberts, H. E. (1998). Encyclopedia of Comparative Iconography: Themes Depicted in Works of Art. Revised edition. NewYork and London: Routledge.
Schroeder, J. E. (1998). Consuming representation: A visual approach to consumer research. In Representing consumers: Voices, views and visions. Editor Stern, B. London and NewYork: Routledge.
Sedghi, M. (2010). Tahlil- e avamel- e moaser dar tasirgozari payam dar tasvir [Analysis of visual Elements in a Message and its influence by illustration]. Ph. D. thesis. Tehran: Tarbiat Modares University.
Sojoodi, F. & Tabatabaie Yazdi, L. (2014/2015). Ideology gensiaty basari dar asar- e naghashan- e zan va mard ba mozoe portreh zanan dar shesh daheh gozashteh dar Iran [Visual gender ideology in the works of male and female painters in the last six decades]. Jameehshenasi- ye Honar va Adabiat, 6(2): 187-211.
Tong, R. (2009). Feminist thought a comprehensive introduction. 3rd edition. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.