Comparing the Spatiality of Architecture and the Temporality of Music in the Ontological Horizon of Heidegger’s Thought

Volume 23, Issue 159
September 2026
Pages 21-28

Document Type : Original Research Article

Author

Department of Music, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

Abstract
Problem statement: The relationship between architecture and music has often been examined within the framework of formal analogies, sensory metaphors, and structural connections that are either reduced to rhythmic similarities and numerical proportions or are limited to the aesthetic experience of the audience. The central question of the research is that if architecture and music are both understood in Heidegger’s thought as ways of the emergence of truth, what is the relationship between the spatiality of architecture and the temporality of music, and how can this relationship open a new horizon for understanding the nature of art?
Research objective: To examine the relationship between architecture and music at a more fundamental level, within the ontological horizon of Martin Heidegger’s thought, rather than focusing on formal or perceptual similarities
Research method: This research has a qualitative and analytical-interpretive aspect and, in accordance with the nature of the question, is based on the analysis of philosophical texts and a critical rereading of existing interpretations. Therefore, relying on the key concepts of Martin Heidegger’s thought, especially his understanding of temporality, presence, the actuality of the artwork, and the relationship between making and inhabiting, the answer would be obtained.
Conclusion: Architecture and music are not simply two arts with different media, but two fundamental ways of realizing being; music as an art whose being unfolds in time, and architecture as one that enables the opening of space, are both understood in relation to the actuality of the work alongside the production process or the experience of the audience. Therefore, their comparison goes beyond the level of analogy only when formulated within the ontological horizon of Heidegger’s thought and with a critical distance from common phenomenological readings. This conclusion can be extended to other arts, because every art represents a way of openness of existence.

Keywords

Subjects
Adeli, S & Nadimi, H. (2020). Conceptual Limits of Form in Architecture. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 17(89), 55-70. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2020.197836.4263
Antoniades, A. C. (1992). Poetics of Architecture: Theory of Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Bowie, A. (2007). Music, Philosophy, and Modernity. Cambridge University Press.
Clifton, T. (1983). Music as Heard: A Study in Applied Phenomenology. Yale University Press.
Dibadj, S. M. (2024). Architecture as Absolute: Reviewing Aristotle’s Metaphysics of Architecture. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 21(131), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2024.366819.5278
Eslampour, S., MirRiahi, S., & Habib, S. (2022). In Search of the Meaning of Home: Explaining the Physical Components Reflecting Its Meaning Through the Theoretical Lens of Phenomenology Case study: Hamedan Yard Houses. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 18(105), 79-92. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2021.274639.4813
Farahani, F. (2013). simaye memari dar musiqiye jahan az doreye ramantik ta moaser, jostojuye hamanandiye memari va musiqi; tahlile haft asare musiqiye barnamei ba mozue memari [The Appearance of Architecture in World Music from the Romantic Period to Contemporary Era, Searching for Similarities between Architecture and Music; Analysis of Seven Program Music Works with the Theme of Architecture]. Journal of Pazhuhesh-e Honar, 5, 15-28.
Gadamer, H. G. (2013). Truth and Method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). Bloomsbury.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Blackwell.
Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, Language, Thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). Harper & Row.
Kramer, J. D. (1988). The Time of Music: New Meanings, New Temporalities, New Listening Strategies. Schirmer Books.
Kramer, L. (1990). Music as Cultural Practice, 1800-1900. University of California Press.
Lewin, D. (2011). Generalized Musical Intervals and Transformations. Oxford University Press.
Norberg-Schulz, C. (1980). Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. Rizzoli.
Palmer, R. E. (1969). Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Northwestern University Press.
Partovi, P., & Bagheryan, M. S. (2017). A Comparative-Adaptive Study about the Meaning of Center According to Isfahan School and Heidegger’s Thought. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 14(48), 17-30. https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_46300.html?lang=en
Vesely, D. (2004). Architecture in the Age of Divided Representation: The Question of Creativity in the Shadow of Production. MIT Press.
Sadeghpour Firouzabadi, A., & Khalilzadeh Moghadam, M. (2011). zabane moshtarak dar memari va musiqi va barresiye an dar honarhaye irani [The Common Language of Architecture and Music and Its Examination in Iranian Arts]. Ketab-e Mah-e Honar, 162, 106-111.
Christensen, P., & Schnabel, M. A. (2010). Virtual Architecture Generated from the Music of J.S. Bach. (N. Moshtagh, Trans.). Maqam-e Musiqaei, 1, 295-301.