The Monarch’s Spatial Accessibility: Examining Six Mirrors for Princes in the Medieval Islamic Period

Volume 22, Issue 150
December 2025
Pages 39-48

Document Type : Original Research Article

Author

Department of Architecture, College Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Iran

Abstract
Problem statement: In contemporary architecture and urban planning, accessibility is recognized as a value, and in the politics of space, it refers to the accessibility of political–social public spaces and the right to the city. Given that contemporary spatial and political frameworks primarily originate from Western theories and practices, this study investigates the notion of accessibility within the historical context of spatial politics in Iran.
Research objectives: This research examines the necessity and mechanisms of accessibility to the king during the Islamic Middle Ages. This period, often regarded as the Islamic Golden Age, produced significant theoretical works in which political thought evolved dynamically in tandem with political power.
Research method: Six mirrors for princes from the Islamic medieval period—namely Qabus-nama by Unsur al-Ma’ali, Siyasat-nama by Nizam al-Mulk, Nasihat al-Muluk by Ghazali, Tuhfat al-Muluk, Akhlaq-i Nasiri by Nasir al-Din Tusi, and Mirsad al-Ibad by Najm Razi—were analyzed. The aim was to extract micro-level mechanisms and patterns of spatial accessibility, reflecting a micro-narrative of the political elites’ ideals of that era.
Conclusion: The mirrors for princes aimed to sustain the regime, not mirror modern state–citizen relations. Nevertheless, shifting focus from the essence to modes of accessibility reveals discursive changes in the mirrors for princes. A linear reading shows the texts evolved beyond simple petitioning. For instance, two texts—Siyasat-nama and Nasihat al-Muluk —explicitly reference spatially grounded models of accessibility, drawing on narratives from early Islam and pre-Islamic Iran. Later mirrors for princes place greater emphasis on the populace and on the signifier of beneficence alongside justice. In practice, benevolence toward the people created conditions that highlighted accessibility. The peak of this emphasis appears in Mirsad al-Ibad, where accessibility is regarded as equivalent to justice and, rather than being merely a virtue, is considered a defining attribute of the Shah.

Keywords

Ahmadi Darani, A.A. (2003). Introduction In A.A.H. Esfahani, Tuhfat al-Mulūk (pp. 13-28). Mirasmaktoob.
Awan, N., Schneider, T., & Till, J. (2011). Spatial Agency: Other Ways of Doing Architecture. Routledge.
Busse, H. (1977). Der persische Staatsgedanke im Wandel der Geschichte. Saeculum, 28(1), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.7788/saeculum.1977.28.1.53
Cambridge Dictionary Online (n.d.). accessibility. In Cambridge English Dictionary. Retrieved  June 4, 2023 from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/accessibility
Dehghan, B., & Baghestani, E. (2014). dhī al-qurbā. Encyclopedia of the World of Islam. https://rch.ac.ir/article/Details/13528 
Dehkhoda, A.A. (1998). Dehkhoda Dictionary (Vol. 13). University of Tehran Press.
Feirahi, D. (2007). Power, knowledge, and legitimacy in Islam (Middle Ages). Ney Publication.
Foucault, M. (1980). POWER/KNOWLEDGE: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 (L. M. Colin Gordon, John Mepham, Kate SoperW, Trans.). Pantheon Books. 
Ghazali, M. (1938). Nasihat al-Muluk (Ed. by J. Huma’i). Madjles publication.
Homaei, J. (1941). Selected Passages from Akhlaq-i Nasiri. Ministry of Culture.
Lambton, A. K. S. (1962). Justice in the Medieval Persian Theory of Kingship. Studia Islamica, 17, 91–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/1595003
Latour, B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern (C. Porter, Trans.). Harvard University Press. 
Meysami, M., & Amir Arjmand, M. (2020). Studying the Culture of Co-existence of the King and Social Classes in The Sayasat Nameh and The Nasihato Moluk. Baharetan-e Sokhan, 17(47), 107-126. https://journals.iau.ir/article_688863.html
Najm Razi, A. (1933). Mirsad al-Ibad (H. Al-hosseini, Ed.). Mat’abe-ye Madjles.
Nasir al-Din Tusi, M. (1967). Akhlaq-i Nasiri (A. Tehrani, Ed.). Javidan Publication Institute.
Nizam al-Mulk, H. (1965). Siyasat-nama (M. Qazvini, Ed.). Zovvar Ketab-foroushi publication.
Riyahi, M.A. (2003). Introduction In Najm Razi, Mirsad al-Ibad (pp.9-126). Elmifarhangi publication.
Sadeghi, E. & Reisi Nafchi, R. (2021). Bar-resi-ye tasvir-e Shah-Ensan-e kamel dar motoun-e nasr-e Ta’limi (Qabus-nama, Siayasat-nama, Akhlagh-i Nasiri, Golestan-e Sa’di va Solouk-ol Molouk) [An examination of the image of the king–perfect man in didactic prose texts (Qabus-nama, Siayasat-nama, Akhlagh-i Nasiri, Golestan-e Sa’di va Solouk-ol Molouk)]. Pazhouhesh-name-ye Adabiat-e Ta’limi, 12(48), 93-128. https://journals.iau.ir/article_681638.html
Saremi, H. & Jalali, A. (2022). Iranian-Islamic City through Economic Views and Urban Activities of Nizam al-Mulk. Journal of Social Theories of Muslim Thinkers, 12(1), 31-48.
Savory, R. (1974). The Safavid State and Polity. Iranian Studies, 7(1/2), 179–212. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4310161 
Shiner, L. (1982) Reading Foucault: Anti-Method and the Genealogy of Power-Knowledge, History and Theory, 21(3), 382-398.
Tabatabai, J. (2000). Essay on Ibn Khaldun: Impossibility of Social Sciences in Islam. Tarh-e-no.
Tabatabai, J. (2004). Decline of Political Thought in Iran. Kavir publication.
Tabatabai, J. (2006). Introduction to the History of Political Thought in Iran. Kavir publication.
Tuhfat al-Mulūk. (Ed. by Ketab-khane-ye Tehran) (1938). Madjles publication.
Unsur al-Maʿali, K. (1964). Qabus-nama (A. Hassouri, Ed.). Tahouri Library.
West-Pavlov, R. (2009) Space in Theory: Kristeva, Foucault, Deleuze. Rodopi.
Yaneva, A. (2017). Five Ways to Make Architecture Political: An Introduction to the Politics of Design Practice. Bloomsbury. 
Zakeri, G. & Shabanlu, A. & Parsapoor, Z., & Mohammadnezhadāli Zamini, Y. (2021). Este’are-ye mafhoumi-ye ‘Edalat’ va ‘Zolm’ dar Adab al-Molouk-ha ba tekiye bar Qabus-nama, Siayasat-nama, and Nasihat al-Muluk [The conceptual metaphor of ‘justice’ and ‘tyranny’ in the Ādāb al-Mulūk Literature, with reference to the Qabus-nama, Siayasat-nama, and Nasihat al-Muluk]. Pazhouhesh-name-ye Adabiat-e Ta’limi, 12(48), 191-220. https://journals.iau.ir/article_681649.html