The Concept of Manifestation in Traditional Arts and its Confrontation with Mechanical Reproduction

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 PH. D Student, Faculty of Art Research, Department of Art, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Art, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Abstract
Problem statement: Traditional arts have been approached differently in terms of theoretical aspects. On the one hand, traditionalists believe in specific components of traditional arts. On the other hand, one of the important topics for contemporary theorists and art researchers is the theory of reproducibility and mechanical reproduction of art. Among the concepts, Manifestation is explored, and expanded from the perspective of thinkers, leading to challenging discussions between two schools of thought.
Research objective: The aim of this article is firstly to explore the concept of manifestation from the perspective of traditionalists and Walter Benjamin, and then to identify and explain how this concept is confronted with mechanical reproduction. Therefore, this research answers the question of “how the concept of manifestation in traditional arts and its confrontation with mechanical reproduction can be articulated?”
Research method: This article employs a descriptive-analytical approach and a comparative study, along with a library-based examination of data and qualitative analysis, to clarify the concept of manifestation in the face of mechanical reproduction.
Conclusion: Based on the coding and analysis of the perspectives of five traditionalist thinkers and Walter Benjamin’s famous article, the constitutive components of manifestation and mechanical reproduction have been identified. According to the performed categorizations, the categories of mechanical reproduction are comparable to the categories of manifestation’s concept, which are opposite to each other except for two components. Therefore, the similarities and differences between them have led to the identification of the components of manifestation in the face of mechanical reproduction. During this process, it became clear that the concept of manifestation has two dimensions and approaches; one is related to the traditionalist perspective and Benjamin’s view, and the other is related to mechanical reproduction. Consequently, considering the comparison between the main categories of these two concepts, it is possible to distinguish the manifestation of mechanical reproduction from the manifestation envisioned by traditionalists and Benjamin, which has taken on a new form and is unavoidable.

Keywords

References

Ahmadi, B. (2010). Truth and Beauty Lectures on the Philosophy of Art. Tehran: Markaz.
Benjamin, W. (1998). The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction (O. Nik-farjam, Trans.). Farabi, 31, 210-225.
Benjamin, W. (2007). Illuminations (H. Zohn, Trans.). New York: Schocken Books.
Binaye Motlagh, S. (2003a). Frithjof Schuon and internal unity of religions. In holy wisdom of immortal, Articles collection of the conference of criticism of modernity from the point of view of contemporary traditionalists, Tehran, Tehran University and Research Institute and development of science human.
Binaye Motlagh, S. (2003b). Frithjof Schuon and meaning of Beauty. In holy wisdom of Immortal, Articles collection of the conference of criticism of modernity from the point of view of contemporary traditionalists, Tehran, Tehran University and Research Institute and Development of Science Human.
Burckhardt, T. (2015). Perennial values in Islamic Art, in Art and spirituality (Articles collection of Art Wisdom, Schuon, Guenon, Coomaraswamy, Nasr and …) (I. A. Rahmati, Trans.). Tehran: Matn.
Burckhardt, T. (1999). Fundamentals of Islamic art (A. Nasiri, Trans.). Tehra: Haghighat.
Burckhardt, T. (2007). Traditional Cosmology and Modern Science (H. Azarcar, Trans.). Tehran: Hekmat.
Coomaraswamy, A. K. (2003). Introduction to Indian art (A. H. Zekrgoo, Trans.). Tehran: Rozane.
Coomaraswamy, A. K. (2010). Christian and Oriental Philosophy of Art (A. H. Zekrgoo, Trans.). Tehran: Matn.
Dehkhoda, A. A. (1998). Dehkhoda Dictionary, vol. 5 and 14. Tehran: Tehran University.
Farzan Yar, H. R. (2020). Titus Burckhardt, Truth and Art, the national conference on thoughts and works of Titus Burckhardt, Iranian truth and philosophy Research institute, Access date (2022), Accessible in irip.ac.ir.
Guenon, R. (2020). Fundamental Symbols: The Universal Language of Sacred Science, Collection of Immortal wisdom (17) (D. Ghahraman, Trans.). Tehran: Hekmat.
Khandaghabadi, H. (2001). Immortal Wisdom, A look at the life and works of contemporary traditionalists. Tehran: Iran knowledge and research development institute.
Lipsey, R. (2010). Traditional Art and Symbolism, Selected Paper by Ananda Kentish Coomaraswamy (S. Tabatabai, Trans.). Tehran: Matn.
Mehregan, O. (2005). Critical aesthetics. Tehran: Game no.
Moin, M. (2003). Moin Encyclopedic Dictionary, Vol 1. Tehran: Amirkabir.
Nasr, S. H. (2017). Knowledge and sacred (F. Haji Mirzai, Trans.). Tehran: Farzan.
Stoddart, W. (2007). Titus Burckhardt and the Tradition School, in Fundamentals of Islamic art (A. Nasiri, Trans.). Tehran: Haghighat.
Schuon, F. (2015). Principles and Criteria of art, in Art and spirituality (Articles collection of Art Wisdom, Schuon, Guenon, Coomaraswamy, Nasr and …) (I. A. Rahmati, Trans.). Tehran: Matn.
Zekrgoo, A. H. (2011). Traditional foundations of art and life, Reflections on Ananda Coomaraswamy’s dance of Shiva. Tehran: Matn.
Zamani, M. (2003). Criticism of modern philosophy from Guenon and Schuon’s viewpoint. In holy wisdom of immortal, Articles collection of the conference of criticism of modernity from the point of view of contemporary traditionalists, Tehran, Tehran University and Research Institute and Development of Science Human.
 
The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar
Volume 20, Issue 128
February 2024
Pages 69-82

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics