A Comparative Study of Architecture in Traditional Bazaar and Golestan Shopping Center in Kermanshah, Iran through the Lens of Synomorphy Theory

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Architecture Department, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Iran.

2 Master in Architecture, Architecture Department, Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Kurdistan, Iran.

Abstract

Abstract
Problem statement: Establishing fitting relationships between users and physical spaces is among the contemporary challenges for architects in a way that the success rates associated with the functional plans of environments are typically assessed based on the structure-behavior connection. As stated by Barker (1968), the high harmony between the physical and social components, also called synomorphy, gives birth to more efficient spaces. Investigating associations between physical environments and behavioral patterns in public spaces has been thus of utmost importance as it helps reach a better understanding of the relationships between humans and their needs as expressed by a diverse set of behaviors in an environment. Against this background, this study reflected on two commercial centers as behavior settings to evaluate the effects of their distinctive physical structures on users’ behavior formation.
Research objective: The main objective of this study was to investigate the synomorphy between physical structures and environmental behaviors in the Traditional Bazaar and Golestan Shopping Center, as a manifestation of contemporary commercial centers, in the city of Kermanshah, Iran. The study attempted to fulfill this goal by answering this question:
How are the functions of commercial centers, traditional and contemporary, improved with emphasis on Barker’s Theory of Behavior Settings (TBS, 1968)?
Research method: Utilizing a qualitative approach and a descriptive-analytical, field-based, unsimulated research design, this applied study was fulfilled at certain intervals.
Conclusion: The study results revealed that the Traditional Bazaar had a much more appropriate function thanks to its stronger structure-behavior synomorphy, and was even quicker to respond to users’ behavioral patterns, granting the prospect of minimizing the diversity of such patterns and undermining the market plan, attributable to the threats and weaknesses. Reflecting on Golestan Shopping Center, the structure-behavior relationship was assessed to be uncomplimentary, so more constructive steps needed to be taken to boost its functions based on the suggestions raised here.

Keywords


Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological Psychology: Concepts and Methods for Studying the Environment of Human Behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bonnes, M. & G. Secchiaroli (1995). Environmental psychology: A psycho-social introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA, US, Sage Publications, Inc.
Charles, E. (2012). Ecological Psychology. In Encyclopedia of Human Behavior: 2nd Ed. Maryland Hights MO: Elsevier.             
Do, T., Nguyen, V. & Nguyen, N. (2019). Impact of the physical environment on user behavioral psychology in urban district park. Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering, 13 (2), 336-352.
Eklund, S. & Scott, M. (1985). Barker’s behavior setting theory: A useful conceptual framework for research on educational administration. Journal of Educational Administration, 23 (1), 82-90.
Faizi, M. & Sohrabian, A. (2014). Barresi taseer gharaghahhaye raftari dar behinehsazi tamol rafter mohet [Investigating the Impact of Behavior Settings in Optimizing Environment-Behavior Interaction]. Daneshnama, 23 (75), 233-235.
Francovich, Ch. (2008). Exploring Leadership Influence Behaviors in the Context of Behavior Settings. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 4 (1), 38-50.
Gehl, I. & Svarre, B. (2013). How to Study Public Life. (M. Behzadfar; M. Rezaei Nadushan & A. Rezaei Nadushan, Trans.). Tehran: Elm-e Memar Publication. [in Persian]
Ghafari, A., Doosti, F., Behzadfar, M. & Varij Kazemi, A. (2018). The Production of Sociable Community Spaces in Inner-Tehran Districts. Sofeh, 28 (1), 69-84.
Golrokh, Sh. (2012). Behavior Setting; a unit of analysis of environment. Tehran: Armanshahr.
Heft, H., Hoch, J., Edmunds, T. & Weeks, J. (2014). Can the Identity of a Behavior Setting Be Perceived Through Patterns of Joint Action? An Investigation of Place Perception. Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 4 (4), 371-393.
Kalis, A. (2023). How Concepts Travel in Actual Spaces: The Interdisciplinary Classroom as a Behavior Setting. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 12 (S1), 50-66.
Keshmiri, H. & Nikounam Nezami, H. (2023). The Concept of Behavioral Setting and its Impact on Improving Environmental Quality Neighborhood Parks (Case Study: Shiraz SEKONJ Neighborhood Park). Iran University of Science & Technology, 33 (2).
Lang, J. (2016). Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design (A. Einifar, Trans.). Tehran: Tehran University Press. (Original work published 1987).
Mansoornia, S., Qaraei, F. & Bahrami, B. (2016). Behavior Mapping, an approach to assessment of Urban spaces responsiveness. Case study: Recreational space of Zrêbar Lake Waterfront, Marivan, Kurdistan. Urban Studies Quarterly, 5 (18), 77-90.
Map of Traditional Bazaar in Kermanshah. (n.d). Retrieved September 1, 2022. Available at https://www.google.com/maps
Momeni, K. & Soltani, P. (2017). Shenakht memari bazaar Kermanshah [Knowledge of Kermanshah Traditional Bazaar architecture]. 12th Symposium on Science and Technology Advances of the Fifth Commission: Sustainable Land, Architecture, and Urban Planning, Mashhad, Iran.
Paknejad, N. & Latifi, Gh. (2018). Explanation and Evaluation of the Impact of Environmental Factors on the Formation of Behavioral Patterns in Urban Spaces (From Theory to Practice: Study of Tajrish Square). Bagh-e Nazar, 15 (69), 51-66.
Paknejad, N., Tabibian, M. & Latifi, Gh. (2019). Explaining the Framework of the Effect of Spatial Organization on the Citizens’ Behavioral Patterns (Comparative Study of the Zargandeh and Darrous Neighborhoods using Urban Network Analysis Method). Armanshahr Architecture and Urbanism, 13 (33), 225-237.
Paknejad, N., Tabibian, M. & Latifi, Gh. (2020). How to form behavioral patterns in the space organization of Zargandeh and Daroos neighborhoods using Agraph software. Bagh-e Nazar, 18 (97), 47-62.
Perkins, D. V., Burns, T. F., Perry, J. C. & Nielsen, K. P. (1988). Behavior setting theory and community psychology: An analysis and critique. Journal of Community Psychology, 16 (4), 355-372.
Popov, L. & Chompalov, I. (2012). Crossing over: The interdisciplinary meaning of behavior setting theory. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2 (19), 18-27.
Raja, V. & Heras-Escribano, M. (2023). Behavior settings, enabling constraints, and the naturalization of social norms. Places, Sociality, and Ecological Psychology: Essays in Honor of Harry Heft, 91.‏ Routledge: Taylor and Francis Group.
Alimadani, M. & Saghafi, P. (2016). Barresi fazahey omomi bazzarhay shahri dar rastaie erteghaei kefeat ghararghahei raftary motalei moredi bazzar shahr Ahar [ A review of the public spaces of city markets in order to improve the quality of behavioral settings, a case study of Ahar city market]. International conference on new researches in civil engineering, architecture and urban planning.
Sajadzadeh, H., Abbasi Kernachi, M. & Sohrabi, N. (2020). Optimizing the Structure of Traditional Bazaars with Emphasis on Spatial Configuration and Interconnection (Case Study: Kermanshah Bazaar). Geography and Environmental Planning31 (3), 79-106.
Scott, M. (2005). A powerful theory and a paradox: Ecological psychologists after Barker. Environment and Behavior, 37 (3), 295-329.
Shahcheraghi, A. & Bandarabad, A. (2015). Environed in Environment: Application of environmental psychology in architecture and urban design. Tehran: Jahad Daneshgahi Publication.
Shoeleh, M., Sadeghi, A., Najafi, P. & Khaksar, Z. (2018). Evaluating Urban Public Realms Based on the Observation and Analysis of Behavioral and Activity Patterns (Case Study: Ahmadi Pedestrian in Shiraz). Urban Studies Quarterly, 7 (25), 45-62. 
Steg, L.,van den Berg, A. & de Groot, J. (2017). Basic Concepts in Environmental Psychology (S. Barzegar., A. Shahpari, Trans.). Tehran: Fekr-e No Publishing.
Strumse, E. (2014). Perceiving, Believing, and Acting in the Physical Environment. Lillehammer University College: Norway.
Tafakor, S., Shahcheraghi, A. & Habib, F. (2019). Comparative Study of the Architecture of the Tajrish Historical Bazaar and Arg Shopping Center: A Synomorphy Theory Approach. Journal of Iranian Architecture Studies, 8(16), 105-132.
Tafakor, S., Shahcheraghi, A. & Habib, F. (2020). Explaining the Criticism Model of Human-Made Public Spaces via Synomorphy Theory: The Case of Iranian Contemporary Shopping Centers and Bazaars. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation in Architecture. Department of Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Art, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Varij Kazemi, A. (2022). Parsezani va zendegi rozmareh Irani [Wandering Around and Iranian Daily Life]. Tehran: Farhang Javid Publications.
Walsh, W. B. (1973). Theories of person-environment interaction: Implications for the college student. American Coll. Testing Program, Mon. Oxford: England.