Identifying the Challenges and Obstacles of Architectural Students’ Cognitive Perceptions in the Architectural Design Process

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

Department of Architecture, Bam Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bam, Iran.

Abstract

Abstract
Problem statement: Architectural education in Iran is encountering fundamental issues and suffering from weaknesses such as confusion in architectural education spaces in Iran, the lack of a somewhat responsive process to the educational needs of students, and,  the lack of the student’s orientation towards learning architectural design. Unfortunately, in universities, professors pay less attention to the subject of “understanding space,” and the problem is how to teach students to create it without a clear understanding of the nature of space. On the other hand, transferring concepts from a visible state to a spatial one is much simpler than transferring them from a mental, verbal, or written state to a spatial one.
Research objective: The main goal of this research is to identify the challenges and problems in teaching architectural design, with an emphasis on the mental perception of students.
Research method: The present study is considered applied in terms of its purpose and data collection and analysis methods within the qualitative research group. The statistical population of the research includes experts and professors in the field of architecture at the Islamic Azad Universities of Tehran and Karaj. The data collection tool is a semi-structured interview, and ATLAS TI software was used for data coding.
Conclusion: The results led to the identification of 46 core codes, 84 indicators, and 17 final themes, which include issues such as the physical conditions of learning environments, outdated methods and design approaches in Iranian universities, the level of familiarity of architecture professors with modern methods, lack of paradigmatic convergence, one-sidedness in architectural design education, visually-centric space creation, and more. Therefore, it can be said that in the educational and research system of Iranian architecture departments, less attention is paid to “mental perception” and architecture students cannot accurately convey their understanding of the environment using past methods such as simple hand tools, paper, and models and convince their audience of the success of their project. Understanding the environment and its mechanisms plays a key role in expressing the environment.

Keywords

References

Asadpour, A., Feizi, M., Mozaffar, F. & Behzadfar, M. (2014). Typology of models and comparative study of methods for registering mental images and cognitive maps of the environment. Bagh-e- Nazar, 12 (33), 13-22.
Motiei, B., Mahdizadeh Seraj, F. & Bayazidi, Gh. (2017). An approach to dynamic and purposeful teaching of basic architecture courses. Education Technology, 13 (1), 191-202.
Abbaspour, A., Shekri, M., Rahimian, H. & Ferastkhah, M. (2018). Effective accountability model of public universities: mixed study. Research in educational systems, 13 (44), 7-22.
Talischi, Gh. R., Izadi, A. A. & Einifar, A. R. (2011). Cultivating the design ability of beginner architectural designers to design, apply and test a constructivist learning environment. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA, 17 (4), 1-18.
Nazi Dizji, S., Kashtkarqalati, A. R. & Parvizi, R.(2009) The use of narration in architectural education. Scientific Research Journal of Education Technology, 5 (2),123-134.
Bahtuyi, R. & Nikkar, M. (2002). The role of aesthetics in the architectural education process, the collection of articles of the international conference of engineering and applied sciences, non-governmental organizations and centers. Tehran, Iran.
Bakhtiyarimanesh, E. (2012). Enhancing balanced sensory perception in the workshop of understanding and expressing the environment. Saffeh, 26 (73), 23-38.
Carmona, M. (2010). Public Spaces Urban Spaces (F. Gharaee, Trans.). Tehran: University of Tehran. [in Persian]
De Jonge, D. (1962). Images of Urban Areas Their Structure and Psychological Foundations. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 28 (4), 266-276.
Downs, R. M. & Stea, D. (1977). Maps in Minds: Reflections on Cognitive Mapping. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.
Ganji, H. (2009). General Psychology. Tehran: Salavan Publications.
Gehl, J. (2012). Human city (A. Ghaffari, and L. Ghafari, Trans.). Tehran: elam-e- Memar Publications.
Gibson, J. J. (1966). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems, Houghton Mifflin. USA: Boston.
Gifford, R. (2017). Research methods in environmental psychology. Tabriz: Publications of Tabriz University of Islamic Arts. [in Persian]
Grabowski, B. J. (2004). Generative Learning Contributions to the Design of Instruction and Learning.[On Line]. Available from: http://www.aect.org/edtech/28.pdf.
Hojjat, I. (2013). Tradition and innovation in architectural education. Tehran: University of Tehran.
Makkizadeh, F., Farajpour, A. H. & Shahni Yeylaq, M. (2011). Identifying Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Web-Based Information Systems by University Users. A Grounded Theory Study. Journal of Academic Library and Information Research,46 (59), 59-81.
Mirzaei, Kh. (2016). Qualitative Research: Research, Researchers, and Writing Research Papers. Tehran: Fuzhan Publications.
Naghizadeh, M. & Ostadi, M. (2013). A Comparative Study of the Concept of Perception and its Process in Philosophy and Environmental Psychology and its Application in Urban Design. Islamic Architectural Researches, 3 (1), 3-14.
Oliver, K. (2007). Psychology in practice: environment. London: Hodder & Stoughton Educational.
Pakzad, J. & Bozorg, H.. (2011). Alphabet of environmental psychology for designers. Tehran: Arman Shahr Publishing House.
Plasma, Y. (2013). Skin Eyes; Architecture and Sensory Perception (R. Qodsi, Trans.). Tehran: Parham Naqsh Publications. [in Persian]
Sarikhani, R., Mousavipour, S., Feiz Abadi, N., Rahimi, E. & Zarea, M. (2016). The effect of education based on the constructivist learning model on the learning outcomes of nursing students in the physiology course. Development Srategies in Medical Education, 4 (1), 16-26.
Shirazi, M. R. (2010). Sensory architecture and the subtle phenomenology of Johann Palasma. Tehran: New Event Publications.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (2012). Basics of qualitative research techniques and stages of production of grounded theory (E. Afshar, Trans.). Tehran: Ney publishing house. [in Persian]
Tabibzadeh, K. S. & Mohammad, P. (2020). A comparison of divergent and convergent thinking in the architectural design process with an emphasis on architectural education. Architectureology, 18 (3), 147-154.
Ueda, H., Toshihiro, N., Norimasa, T., Elena, P., Hajime, M., Katsunori, F. & Yoji, A. (2012). Landscape image sketches of forests in Japan and Russia. Forest Policy and Economics 19.
Ustaomeroglu, A. A. (2015). Concept-interpretation-product in architectural design studios-karadeniz technical universty 2nd semester sample. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 7th World Conference on Educational Sciences, (WCES-2015), 05-07 February 2015, Novotel Athens Convention Center, Athens, Greece 197, 1897-1906.
Uysal, M., Aydin, D. & Siramkaya, S. B. (2012). A model intended for building the design education in the context of cultural variety and continuity: Sille design studio. Procedia-social and Behavioral Sciences, (51), 53-63.
Wittrock, M. C. (1989). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational psychologist, 24 (4), 345-376.
Yeravani, M. & Khodapanahi, M. K. (2000). Psychology of Emotion and Perception. Tehran: Samt.
Zanganeh, H. & Fardanesh, H. (2010). Designing an educational model based on the theory of constructivist learning. Development Horizon of Medical Education, 4 (1), 19-28.
 
The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar
Volume 20, Issue 125
November 2023
Pages 79-92

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics