Reading, Revising and Reviewing the Kufic Inscriptions on the Caravanseries of Khorasan Razavi

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 PhD. Student Archaeology, Department of History & Archaeology, Faculty of Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences, Science And Research Branch,Islamic Azad University,Tehran,Iran.

2 Department of Archaeology,Tarbiat Modares University,Tehran,Iran.

Abstract

Problem statement: Kufic inscriptions of Islamic architecture are considered the ancient era masterpieces of Iran and the Islamic world. Some of the Caravanseries in Razavi Khorasan province are counted among superb monuments in terms of decorations and architecture. However, the antiquity of some of them has not yet been well analyzed. Monumental inscriptions are often the most outstanding architectural elements that can direct the researchers through their endeavors from various viewpoints. Therefore, we deemed it critical to review the inscriptions under the study in terms of the scripts, objectives, various calligraphy types, etc., and determine their impacts on the identity of the monuments of interest.
Research objective: This study tries to comparatively review the inscriptions, scan the obscure ones, and correct the erroneous scanning of some others. In this spirit, the authors focused their efforts on presenting advice on the recreation of the inscriptions found at Robat (a small fortification built along a frontier) Mahi excavation site. They determined some of the monuments’ ages through a critical approach toward inscriptions scanning by employing the surviving texts and shreds of evidence.
Research method: The present study was conducted through survey and archeological research methods. First, the inscriptions were recorded using the survey investigations. Then it was attempted to accurately identify the events of the past to further clarify the historical, political, and economic identities of the monuments under investigation through library research, verification of the firsthand resources, evidence gathered by the past photographers, and then through data analysis and classification, following the historical approach.
Conclusion: This study revealed that the writing structure of the Kufic inscriptions was based on the early Kufic scripts with diverse writing styles and that the artists have employed the decoration factor in conveying their message. The placement of the inscriptions in the predetermined spaces is in abundant congruity and harmony with their associated monuments. A reason for inscribing the scripts has been to serve religious purposes. Some advice was then made for age determination of Caravanseries of Ziarat, Mahi, and Sharaf sites after scanning and reading some of the inscriptions.

Keywords


The holy Quran.
Ali Shahroodi, F. (2009). Advent and Evolution of Calligraphy in Iran. Tehran: Rasanesh.
Daneshdoust, Y. (1981). Robat-e Sharaf, Athar, (5), 1-39.
Faghihi, A. A. (1996). Alebuye va oza-e zaman-e ishan ba nemudari az zendegi-ye mardom dar aan asr [The Buyids and the Situation of their Time with a Representation of the People’s Life in that Era]. Tehran: Saba.
Godard, A. (1949). Robat sharaf, Athar-e Iran, annales Du service archeologique de iran, Tome IV, 7-68.
‎Grohmann, A. (2004). The origin and early development of floriated Kufic (M. Shayestehfar trans.). Tehran: Islamic Art studies.
Hamid Safadi, Y. (1996). Calligraphy in the Islamic World (Translated by M. Hosseini trans.). Honar, (31), 31-68.
Herawi, J. (2003). Tarikh-e Samanian [The History of the Samanid Dynasty]. Tehran: Amirkabir.
Ibn Hawqal. (n.d). Surat Al-Ard. Beirut: Dar Maktabah Al-Hayat.
Ibn Khalkan, A. (1968). Wafiat Al-A’yan wa Anba’ Abna’ Al-Zaman. Vol.4. Work of: Ihsan Abbas. Beirut: Dar Sader.
Ibn Khordadbeh, A. (1889). Masālik w’al Mamālik​. Work of: Dakhviah. Liden: braille.
Ibn Athir. (2004). The Complete History (H. Rouhani & H. Ajir trans.). Vol. 12. Tehran: Asatir.
Kiani, M. Y. (1995). Iranian Architecture of the Islamic period. Tehran: SAMT.
Labbaf Khaniki, R. A. (1988). Unpublished The report of the investigation and identification of the historical monuments of Khorasan. Torbat Heydariyyeh (Khaaf).
Labbaf Khaniki, R. A. (2005). A Reflection on the Naming of Robat Sharaf. The Series of Articles in the Third Convention of the Iranian Architecture and Urban Engineering History. Vol. 2. Tehran: The Cultural Heritage and Tourism Organization. pp. 86-98.
Moghaddasi, A. (1982). Ahsan Al-Taqasim fi Ma’rifati Al-Aqalim (A. N. Monzavi trans.). Tehran: Koomesh.
Mousavi Jazayeri, S. M.V. (2013). Ancient Primary Kufic in the Manuscripts. Tehran: Ketabe Aban.
Nizami Aruzi, A. (1985). Chahár maqála (Four discourses). Work of: Mohammad Moe’in. Tehran: Amir Kabir.
Pope, A.U. (1977). A survey of Persian Art. Vol.4. Tehran: Soroush Press.
Qudama B. Ja’Far, A. (1981). Al-Kharaj Wa-Sina’at Al-Kitaba. Explanation and research: Muhammad Hussein Al-Zubaidi. Al-Jumhuriyyah Al-Araqiyah. Wizarah Al-Thaqafah wa Al-A’lam. Baghdad: Dar Al-Rashid Li-nnashr.
Sarfaraz, A. & Avarzamani, F. (2000). Iranian coins from the early beginning to Zand. Tehran: SAMT.
Semsar, M. H. & Sara’iyan, F. (2003). Golestam palace photo archive: catalogue of Qajar selected photo graphs. Tehran: The National Cultural Heritage Organization and the Ministry of Islamic Culture and Guidance.
Steve, M. J. (1996). TChogha Zanbil (Dūr Untašh). Texts Elamites et Accadiens the tchogha zanbil. Vol. 3. (A. Karimi trans.) Tehran: Cultural Heritage Organization.
The technical office of the national organization for the preservation of the historical monuments in Khorasan. (1974). Unpublished registered report on Robat Mahi.
The technical office of the national organization for the preservation of the historical monuments in Khorasan. (1998). Unpublished technical office of the national organization for the preservation of the historical monuments in Khorasan.
Zahabi, Sh.. (1989). Tarikh Al-Islam wa Wafiyyat Al-Mashahir wa Al-A’lam. Work of: Umar Abd Al-Salam Tadmori. Beirut: Dar Al-Kitab Al-Arabi.