A Comparative Study of the Concept of Abstraction in Islamic and Western Art (Based on the Traditionalist Theories)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant Profrssor, Shushtar Faculty of Arts, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran.

2 M. Sc. Student of Art Research, Shushtar Faculty of Arts, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran.

Abstract

Problem statement: Islamic philosophy and art theoreticians, such as Burckhardt, considered Islamic art as abstract since it presents divine mysteries in Eastern art through symbolization. Hence, traditional art is sacred art with an abstract model of expression that avoids figurative and naturalistic representation. On the other hand, in Europe during the 20th century, Kandinsky started a movement in the visual arts to discover the visual features beyond the visual-narrative realm of the real world. They believed that painting, like music, should set itself free from the boundaries of mimesis or imitation of nature and narratives and influence its audience merely through forms and colors. Both of these attitudes have their theoretical foundations and reasons that are different from each other. The present study seeks to answer the following questions: What is the meaning, function, and characteristics of the word “abstraction” in both the abovementioned perspectives? What are the concepts of traditionalists and Western art critics from the term “abstraction” and how are they related to each other?
Research method: This basic research used a descriptive-analytical method and first attempted to find the exact meaning of the word “abstraction”. Afterward, it examined and compared the characteristics of Islamic art from the traditionalist thinkers’ points of view and the concept of “abstraction” in Western artists’ opinions.
Research objective: This study discusses art and stylistics in the theoretical field of art research and can be effective in the development of discussions on “the nature of art”.
Conclusion: There are similarities and differences in the use of the word “abstraction” in Islamic and Western art. In both of them, the artist and the audience are detached from the material and objective world. Both of these perspectives try to present something beyond what is visible and for this reason, the artists try to employ mysteries and symbols to present their artworks.

Keywords

References

Akrami, J. (2011). Koodak va Tasvir [Child and Image, studies on the illustration of children’s and teenagers’ books] Vol 2. Tehran:  Soroush Publishing Inc.
 Asgari, F. & Eghbali, P. (2013). Tajali-ye Namad- ha-ye Rangi dar Ayeene-ye Honar-e Eslami[Reflection of Color Symbols in the Mirror of Islamic Art ]. Jelveh Honar, 5(1), 43- 61.
 Avini, M. (1998). Mabani-ye Nazari-ye Honar az Didgah -e Shahid Morteza Avini [Theoretical foundations of art from the perspective of Martyr Morteza Avini]. Qom: Nabavi Publishing Inc.
Burckhardt, T. (2013 a). Sacred Art in East and West: Its Principles and Methods (M. Sattari, Trans.). Tehran: Soroush Publishing Inc. 
 Burckhardt, T. (2013 b). Art of Islam, Language and Meaning ( M. Rajabnia, Trans.). Tehran: Yekta.
 Dehkhoda, A. A. (1963). Loght Name  Dehkhoda [ Dehkhoda Dictionary]. Tehran: Soroush
 Farahmand, V. & Haghir, S. (2014).Abstract Art and Narrative Elimination. Honar-ha-ye-Tajassomi, 19 (4), 2-15.
 Gambrich, E. (2000). History of Art (R. Ali, Trans.). Tehran: Ney Publishing Inc.
 Goodarzi, M. (2001). Tamoli bar Bazshenasi Honar-e  Abstreh [A Reflection on the Recognition of Abstract Art]. Honar-hay-ye- Ziba, 1 (9), 30 - 42.
 Gooding, M. (2013). Abstract Art  (H. Afshar, Trans.). Tehran: Markaz Publishing Inc.
 Hauser, A. (1998). Social History of Art, Vol 1. (E. Younesi, Trans.). Tehran: Kharazmi Publications.
Jahanbegloo, R. (2010). Darjoostejoo-ye Amr-e Ghodsi: Goftegoo-ye Ramin Janhan Bagloo Ba Seyyed Hossein Nasr [In Search of the Sacred: A Conversation with Seyyed Hossein Nasr on His Life and Thought]. Tehran:  Ney Publishing Inc.
 Khazaei, M. (2011). Proceedings of the First Iranian Islamic Art Conference. Tehran: Institute of Islamic Art Studies.
 Lynton, N. (2003). The Story of Modern Art (A. Ramin, Trans.). Tehran: Ney Publishing Inc.
 Mansouri, S. A. & Teymouri, M.(2016). Criticism on the Opinions of Contemporary Traditionalists in Islamic Art and Architecture; Based upon the Concept of the Tradition in Definition of Islamic Architecture. CIAUJ, 1 (1), 1-14.
 Motahari Elhami, M. (2005). Honar va Memari [Art and Architecture], Khial, (9), 30-42.
 Nasr, S. H. (1994). Alam-e Khial va Mafhoom-e Faza dar Minator-e Irani [The World of Imagination and the Concept of Space in Iranian Miniature]. Faslname Honar, (26), 79-86.
Nasr, S.H. (2010). Honar va Manavite Eslami [Art and Islamic Spirituality]. Tehran: Hekmat Publishing Inc.
Pakbaz, R. (2007). Naghashi-ye Iran az Dirbaz  ta Emrooz [iran Paintings from Ancient Times until Today].Tehran: Zarrin and Simin.
Pakbaz, R. (2009). Dayerato Al Maraa’fe Honar [Encyclopedia of Art]. Tehran: Farhang Moaser.
 Rahnavard, Z. (2015). Hekmat- e Honar-e Eslami [The Wisdom of Islamic Art]. Tehran: Samat Publishing Inc.
 Ravanjoo, A. (2012). A Glance at the Nature and Concept of Tradition and Art Education. Peykareh, 1 (1), 9-22.
 Sartipipour, M. (2008). Origins of Islamic Art in Titus Burckhardt’s Thinking. Soffeh, 46(17), 91-100.
 Sauvanet, P. (2017). Fundamentals of Aesthetics (M.R. Abolghasemi, Trans.). Tehran, Mahi Publishing Inc.
 Schrader, P. (1998). The Transcendental Style in Film: Ozu Bresson Drever (M. Gozarabadi, Trans.). Tehran: Farabi Cinema Foundation Publications.
 Zamani Babgohari, F. (2014). Exploration of abstraction in the portraiture of children’s books, Peykareh, 3(6), 55-62.  
 
The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar
Volume 18, Issue 97
June 2021
Pages 79-92

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics