Recognizing the Correspondence of Alchemy and Sacred Art in Iran by Studying Luster-Ware Mihrabs

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Art Research, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor of Department of Art Research, Faculty of Art, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Professor of Department of Art Research, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Tehran Center Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Problem statement: The basis of alchemy, contrary to what is presented to people today, has mystical aspects and without mysticism, alchemy is no longer considered alchemy. Alchemy is associated with mysticism in monotheistic religions and has been of great value in Islam. Mysticism is the source of Islamic sacred art and historically it has had a deep relation with alchemy. Among the sacred arts luster-ware mihrab is one of the most comprehensive examples. In the art of Luster-ware, a worthless brick is transformed into a tile with a luster-ware resplendence by performing an operation that corresponds to an alchemy allegorical action which is the transformation of a base metal into gold. This correspondence, along with the union between Islamic mysticism and alchemy, suggests the importance of alchemy in the structure of sacred art, especially in luster-ware mihrabs. The Main Question is what role did alchemy play in shaping the luster-ware mihrabs and how are the symbols of alchemy in these works manifested
Research objective: The main purpose of this article is to explain the importance of alchemy, as wisdom related to Islamic mysticism, in the decoration of the luster-ware mihrabs.
Research method: In this research, due to its historical nature, library resources are used and a comparative study of luster-ware mihrabs as one of the most comprehensive sacred works in the Islamic art of Iran, is conducted with symbols of alchemy in a descriptive-analytical manner.
Conclusion: By visually studying the luster-ware mihrabs, the effects of alchemy as an ancient mysticism in Islamic art of Iran can be observed. The concepts of alchemy have appeared in the visual form of the luster-ware mihrabs, with a cryptic expression and in the form of overt and covert symbols. These symbols, like alchemy itself, have a thematic scope. Alchemical symbols, laws of reflection and duality, geometric motifs such as circle, square, seal of Solomon and the figure of snake are among the symbols that reveal the connection between the luster-ware mihrabs and alchemy mysticism and also show the presence of alchemy in the visual system of Islamic sacred art.

Keywords


Abbasi, A. (2013). Jostar-ha-yi dar chisti-ye honar-e Eslami [Exploring what Islamic art is] (By H. Rabi’i). Tehran: Farhangestan-e Honar.
Abed Esfahani, A. & Holakouee, P. (2006). Barrasi-ye amali-ye teknik-e ijad-e taz’inat-e zarrinfam bar rouye lo’ab-ha-ye doran-e Eslami [Practical study of the technique of making luster-ware ornaments on the glazes of the Islamic era]. Islamic Art, (5), 155-169.
Ardalan, N. & Bakhtiar, L. (2015). The Sense of Unity: The Sufi Tradition in Persian Architecture. Tehran: Elm-e Me’mar-e Royal.
Assmann, J. (2019). The Ancient Egyptian Myth of the Journey of the Sun. Aegyptiaca, (4), 19-32.
Bayadar, H. & Towfiqi, P. (2014). Namadshenasi-ye mehrab dar erfan va honar-e Eslami [Symbolism of the mihrab in Islamic Mysticism and Art]. Motale’at-e Ma’navi, (11 & 12), 153-173.
Bolkhari Ghahi, H. (2006). The cosmological position of circles and squares in sacred (Islamic) architecture. Honar-Ha-Ye Ziba, (24), 5-14.
Bolkhari Ghahi, H. (2015). Ghadr: Nazariye-ye Honar va Ziba’i dar Tamaddon-e Eslami [Qadr: Theory of Art and Beauty in Islamic Civilization]. Tehran: Soure-ye Mehr.
Burkhardt, T. (2009). Alchemy: Science of the Cosmos, Science of the Soul (G. Ra’adi Azarakhshi & P. Faramarzi, Trans). Tehran: Hekmat.
Dadvar, A. & Dalai, A. (2016).Mabani nazari honarhaye sonaty: Iran dar dore islami [Theoretical foundations of traditional arts Iran in the Islamic period]. Tehran: MorakabSepid.
Faghfoori, R. & Bolkhari Ghahi, H. (2014). Tajalli-ye hekmat-e Eslami dar sakhtar va mazamin-e mehrab-e zarrinfam-e Haram-e Motahhar-e Razavi [Wisdom of Islamic architecture, a deep analysis to structure and contents of luster Altar of Razavi Holy Shrine]. NAQSH-E JAHAN, 4(1), 7-15.
Gharagozli, K. (2010). Kimia: elm-e jahan, elm-e jan [Alchemy: science of the cosmos, science of the soul]. Ketab-e Mah-e Din, (154), 54-60.
Imeni, A. (2010). Bayan-e namadin dar taz’inat-e me’mari-ye Eslami [Symbolic expression in Islamic architectural decorations]. Ketabmah-e Mah-e Honar, (142), 86-92.
Kalbasi Ashtari, H. & Pashayi, H. (2017). Henry Corbin’s studies of Islamic gnosis with an emphasis on hermetic tradition. Kheradname-ye Sadra, (87), 35-50.
Kameli, S. & Aminpoor, A. (2017). Study of symbolic pictures of the Sun in mihrab and mihrab form Tombstones of 4th to 7th centuries of Hijri calendar. Motaleate-e Tatbighi-e Honar, 13(7), 63-77.
Keshavarzi, M. & Ahmadi Sheykhani, M. (2010). Hendese-ye Noghoush [Geometry of designs]. Tehran: Farhang-e saba.
Kouhkan, R. (2015). Pensee Alchimiique de Tughrai. Sarrebruck: Universitaisres Europeennes.
Kouhkan, R. (2016). Historian or alchemist as etymologist: case study of the title “al-Kīmīyā”. History of Science, 14(1), 97-113.
Kouhkan, R. & Joharchi, M. (2019). The Secret of Secrets in Alchemy of al-Rāzī; A Reflection on Two Fundamental Concepts: Tincture and Elixir, in the Tradition. History of Science, 17(2), 305-341.
Martin, S. (2006). Alchemy and Alchemists. Harpenden: Pocket Essentials.
Mehrpooya, H. & Ghasemi, M. (2008). Tamayoz honar dini va honar ghodsi dar ara-e-motefakeran-e-moaser [The difference between religious art and sacred art in the views of contemporary researchers]. Rahpooye-ye Honar, (6), 10-15.
Mo’taghedi, K. (2018). Persian Ceramic Mihrabs. Tehran: Sazman-e Zibasazi-ye Tehran.
Moghaddam Heydari, G. & Kavousi Rahim, A. (2016). Status of Practicality and Experiment in Ḥassan ibn Zāhid Kirmānī’s Alchemical Thought. History of Science, 14(2), 201-219.
Moran, B. T.(2011). Alchemy and the history of science. Isis, (102), 300-304.
Ludy, F. (1928). Alchemistische und Chemische Zeichen. Burgdrof: Gesellschaft fur Geschicte der pharmazie.
Orobaton, N. (2018). A short treatise on the alkahest of Paracelsus. Alchemy Journal, 14(1), 4-7.
Rouhfar, Z. (2009). Research on the production of luster ware in Iran: with emphasis on the book of Abolghasem Abdullah Kashani, 7th-8th centuries A.H. (Unpublished doctoral Dissertation). Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Salmani, A. & Chatrbahr, H. (2016). An adaptive methodology of the Islamic art studies, case study: mihrab. Pazhohesh-ha-ye Bastanshenasi-ye Iran, 6(11), 177-190.
Salmani, G, M. (2017). Barrasi-ye taz’inat mehrab-e asr-e-Ilkhani [Study of mihrab decorations of the Ilkhani era]. Human Science Research, 3(20), 243-259.
Seligman, K. (1998). History of Magition (I. Golsorkhi, Trans). Tehran: Elm Publishing.
Shokrpur, S. & Mirshafiee, M. (2019). The treatise “al-Durra al-Meknuna”, the oldest written document on the luster enamel. Journal of Research on Archaeometry, 1(9), 179-185.
Zohdi, M. & Farrokhfar, F. (2018). Analysis of thematic, visual and structural characteristics of the gilded mihrābs during Ilkhanate era. History and Culture, 5(1), 179-185.