Evaluating the Emergence Level of Semantic Values Hidden in the Historical Body of Sepah Street in Tehran

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. student in Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Emirates Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

2 Associate Professor, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Tehran-Center, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Architecture, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Problem statement: The semantic values hidden in the architectural context of historical structures are investigated in this study. The research studies the interaction between form and meaning and investigates the complex links between the body, form, and spirit of architecture by focusing on the case of Sepah Street in Tehran. 
Research objective: This study is based on the concept that architectural design has a deep capacity to convey meanings and these meanings are often deciphered through roles, expectations, and motivations. 
Research method: The main question of the research revolves around understanding the inherent semantic structure of the historical bodies of Sepah Street and how these structures help to understand the place. The study assumes that the architectural semantic values of historical structures can be analyzed through 25 indicators grouped into five value levels. These levels include various aspects such as basic balance, functional compatibility, emotional attachment, cultural identity, and symbolic abstraction. The research method was historical content analysis and data were collected quantitatively.
Conclusion: The results show that Sepah Street has a dynamic balance between tradition and modernity. This architecture shows a remarkable ability to expand the organic form while maintaining its essential character. The proportion, connection, rhythm, and order components create a harmonious unity among building elements that enhance the place’s sense. The historical context of the street seamlessly interacts with its surroundings and shows the importance of continuity and interaction. This study shows how the architectural configuration of Sepah Street communicates with its residents on emotional levels. The architectural simplicity of this place fosters a strong sense of belonging, while the intentional inclusion of ambiguity and harmony evokes an emotional depth that resonates with observers. In addition, this research shows how architectural design responds to cultural and symbolic values and shows identity, contrast, and harmony. The precise orchestration of these elements helps to form a coherent and meaningful architectural context.  In short, the research analyzes the semantic values hidden in the historical context of Sepah Street in Tehran., It highlights the subtle interplay between architectural form and the evocation of meaning by exploring the instant, functional, emotional, cultural, and symbolic dimensions comprehensively. The findings emphasize the importance of architectural design not only in the physical dimension but also in the essence of place, culture, and identity.

Keywords

References

Cheshmehzangi, A. & Mofid, T. (2012). Urban Identities: Influences on Socio-Environmental Values and Spatial Inter-Relations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, (36), 253-264.
Cuba, L. & Hummon, D. M. (1993). A place to call home: identification with dwelling, community, and region. The Sociological Quartery, (34), 111-131
Diba, D. (1999). Concept and fundamental principles of Iran. Memari-ye Farhang, (15) 0-0.
Gruter, J. (2009). Aesthetics in architecture (J. Pakzad & A. Homayun, Trans.). Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University.
Habibi, K. (1998). Improvement and renovation of old urban structures. Tehran: Entekhab-e Aval.
Haroon, j. M., Eisenhauer, B. W. & Stedman, R. C. (2013). Environmental concern: Examimnig the role of place Meaning and Place attachment. Society & Natural Resources, 26(5), 522-538.
Hedman, R. & Yazowski, A. (2005). Basics of Urban Design (R. Rezazadeh &  M. Abbas-Zadegan). Tehran: University of Science and Technology.
Hojjat, M. (2015). Presence and emergence on silence and light description. Tehran: Elmi.
Javan Foruzandeh, A. & Motalebi, Gh. (2011). The concept of belonging sense to a place and its constituent factors. Hoviyatshahr, 5(8), 27 – 37.
Kalali, P. & Modiri, A. (2012). Explaining the role of the meaning component in the process of forming a sense of place. Fine Arts, 17(2), 43-51.
Lai, L. Y., Said, I. & Kubota, A. (2013). The Roles of Cultural Spaces in Malaysia’s Historic Towns: The Case of Kuala Dungun and Taiping. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, (85), 602-625.
Masaeli, S. (2017). Evaluation of the hidden map as an achievement of religious beliefs in architecture, the influence of Islam on traditional housing, a case study of Kerman. (Unpublished Ph.D. thesis in Architecture). School of Architecture, Fine Arts faculty. Tehran University, Iran.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1996). In praise of philosophy (S. Houman, Trans.). Tehran: Markaz.
Mısırlısoy, D. (2016). Contemporary extensions and heritage buildings: A design methodology. Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.
Mornement, A. (2007). Extensions. London: Laurence King Publishing.
Naghizadeh, M. (1996). The wisdom of hierarchy in architecture and urban planning. Second congress of architecture and urban planning history. Kerman: Arg-e- Bam.
Naghizadeh, M. (2000). The relationship between the identity of “Iranian architectural tradition” and and “modernism”. Fine Arts, (7), 79-91.
Norbeg-Schultz, C. (1980). Philsophy amd the city: classic to contemporary writing. NewYork: State university of NewYork press.
Rappaport, A. (2005). The meaning of built environment: an approach on non-verbal communication (F. Habib, Trans.). Tehran: Urban Planning and Processing Company.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion
Schittich, C. (2013). In Detail Building in Existing Fabric, Birkhauser. Berlin.
Stedman, C. R. (2003). Is It Really Just a Social Construction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society and Natural Resources, (16), 671-685.
Tabatabai, M. (2017). Urban walls and their role in the urban space, (Facade design criteria in the urban space). Tehran: Arman Shahr.
Taqvai, V. (1389). From what it is to the definition of architecture. Hoviatshahr, 4(7), 75-86.
Tavasoli, M. (1999). Urban design of Kargar Street: between Enghelab Square and Hor Square. Tehran: Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, Urban Development and Improvement Company.
Williams, D. R., Anderson, B. S., Mc Donald C. D. & Patterson, M. E. (1995). Measuring Place Attachment: More Preliminary Results. Paper presented at the 1995 Leisure Research Symposium, NRPA Congress, San Antonio, Texas.
The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar
Volume 20, Issue 129
March 2024
Pages 17-32

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics