An Evaluation of the Behavior Settings in the Territory of Sacred Places Case Study: The Peripheral Territory of Hazrat Masoumeh’s Holy Shrine

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 M.A of Urban Design, Urban Planning Department, Architecture and Urban Planning Faculty, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Urban Design, Urban Planning Department, Architecture and Urban Planning Faculty, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor of Urban Planning, Urban Planning Department, Architecture and Urban Planning Faculty, Art University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

Problem statement: In the pilgrimage hierarchy to the holy shrines, pilgrims are objectively and subjectively influenced by the environment-behavior system when passing through behavior circuits and this overshadows their behavioral patterns. The principle of synomorphy and congruence of physical structures with behavioral patterns in the milieu-behavior form or behavior settings, which play a key role in enhancing the quality of spiritual territories with the role of pilgrimage, has been less discussed.
Research objective: This present study aims to identify and measure the synomorphy of behavior settings in the territory of sacred places by examining the areas specified for the pedestrianized pilgrimage to Hazrat Masoumeh’s holy shrine as a case study.
Research method: The present study is the mixed-method research (quantitative-qualitative) carried out using a descriptive-analytical research method. For data collection, library and field methods were used at five intervals in six months. The data were collected through direct observations by a trained observer, behavioral mapping and tracking, photography, and questionnaires. Then the data were analyzed using deductive-inductive reasoning.
Conclusion: The research findings indicate that the behavior settings of this territory with various programs and functions present a range of both compatible and incompatible behaviors with the context. In recent years, the policy of creating pedestrianized areas has promoted the synomorphy of the fabric by establishing religious rituals in this territory as the most important standing pattern of behaviors in this religious setting. However, the weakness of the physical structure in responding to some static behavioral patterns in usual and specific days, indicates that the physical structure of these behavior settings is not sufficiently compatible with all the needs and activities of the pilgrims. So, the redefinition of these behavior settings as pilgrimage areas requires more design considerations according to the principle of milieu-behavior synomorphy and considering the pilgrimage culture of this territory.

Keywords

References

Abioso, W. S. & Triyadi, S. (2017). The Behavior-Milieu Synomorphy of Communal Space in Desa Adat Tengnan Pegringsingan Bali Indonesia. International Journal of Architecture Arts and Applications, 3(2), 11-20.
Bahrainy, S. H. (2012). Urban Space Analysis. Tehran: University of Tehran Press.
Bandarabad, A. & Shahcheraghi, A. (2017). Environed in the environment: Application of environmental psychology in architecture and urban planning. Tehran: Tehran’s Academic Center for Education, Culture, and Research.
Barrie, T. (2012). Sacred Space and the Mediating Roles of Architecture. European Review, 20(1), 79-94.
Birch, R. & Sinclair, B. R. (2013). Spirituality in place: Building connections between architecture, design, and spiritual experience. In ARCC Conference Repository. University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 80-87.
Eliade, M. (1996). The Sacred and the Profane (N. Zangui, Trans.). Tehran: Soroush.
Eliade, M. (1998). Sacred place (B. D., Trans.). Name-ye Farhang, 3 (1).
Eliade, M. (2014). Symbolism, the Sacred, and the Arts (M. Salehi Allameh, Trans.). Tehran: Niloufar.
Francovich, C. (2008). Exploring Leadership Influence Behaviors in the Context of Behavior Settings. International Journal of Leadership Studies, (4), 38-50.
Gehl, J. & Svarre, B. (2017). How to study public life. (M. Behzadfar, M. Rezai & A. Rezai, Trans.). Tehran: Royal institute of Elm-e Memar.
Golrokh, Sh. (2012). Behavior setting: a unit for environmental analysis. Tehran: Armanshahr.
Heft, H., Hoch, J., Edmunds, T., & Weeks, J. (2014). Can the identity of a behavior setting be perceived through patterns of joint action? An investigation of place perception. Behavioral Sciences, 4(4), 371-393.
Hill, M. R. (1984). Stalking the urban pedestrian: a comparison of questionnaire and tracking methodologies for behavioral mapping in large-scale environments. Environment and Behavior, 16(5), 539-550.
Lawson, B. (2007). Language of space. New York:  Routledge.
Mazumdar, S. & Mazumdar, S. (2004). Religion and place attachment: A study of sacred places. Journal of environmental psychology, 24(3), 385-397.
Meagher, B. R. (2018). Deciphering the religious orientation of a sacred space: Disparate impressions of worship settings by congregants and external observers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, (55), 70-80.
Moore, R. C. & Cosco, N. G. (2010). Using behavior mapping to investigate healthy outdoor environments for children and families. In C. Ward Thompson, P. Aspinall, & S. Bell (Eds.), Innovative approaches to researching landscape and health: Open space: People space 2 (pp. 33e73). Abingdon: Routledge.
Motalebi, Gh., Eslami, F., Taheri, S., Gardi Takhti, S. & Mahdavi, A. (2016). The Evolution of the Perception of Meaning of Imam Reza Shrine over Time. The Culture of Islamic Architecture and Urbanism, 2 (3), 15-25.
Nasar, J. L. (2011). Environmental psychology and urban design.  In: Banerjee, T. Sideris, Anastasia Loukaitou (Ed.). Companion to Urban Design. New York: Routledge.
Popov, L. & Chompalov, I. (2012). Crossing over: The interdisciplinary meaning of behavior setting theory. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(19), 18-27.
Rajabi, M., Noqsan Mohammadi, M. & Montazer Al-Hodjjah, M. (2019). Functional Patterns in the Spaces of Hosseiniehs of Taft. Journal of Iranian Architecture Studies, 8 (16), 181-204.
Ranjbar Taklimi, F. (2016). Urban design around the Godal Mosalla set with the goal of enhancing Presence emphasizing the citizens’ Behavioral Pattern. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Faculty of Art and Architecture, Department of Urban Planning, Yazd University, Iran.
Salehinia, M. & Memarian, G. (2012). Sociopetaloid of architecture space; Synthesis and synomorphy of humane-physical factors. International Journal of Architectural Engineering & Urban Planning, 22(1), 7-19.
Seghatoleslami, A. & Rohi Mirabadi, Z. (2020). Analysis of the Urban Spaces around the Holy Places on the Needs and Behavioral Patterns of Pilgrims; Case Study: Imam Reza (PBUH) Street, Mashhad City. Armanshahr, 13 (32), 205-218.
Serageldin, I., Shluger, E. & Martin-Brown, J. (Eds.). (2001). Historic cities and sacred sites: cultural roots for urban futures.Washington: World Bank.
Sheldrake, P. (2007). Placing the sacred: Transcendence and the city. Literature and theology, 21(3), 243-258.
Tafakkor, S., Shahcheraghi, A., Habib, F. (2019). Comparative Study of the Architecture of the Tajrish Historical Bazaar and Arg Shopping Center: a Synomorphy Theory Approach. Journal of Iranian Architecture Studies, 8 (16), 105-131.
Wang, P. F. & Ho, M. C. (2011). Constructing a preliminary model for designing sacred space. Bulletin of Japanese Society for the Science of Design, 58(4), 31-40.
Wicker, A. W. (2002). Ecological psychology: Historical contexts, current conception, prospective directions. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 114–126). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Wing, S. (2015). Designing sacred space. Routledge.
The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar
Volume 19, Issue 107
May 2022
Pages 21-40

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics