عنوان مقاله [English]
Problem statement: Today’s country of Armenia, a part of the ancient Urartu, as the first land that officially accepted Christianity, has built the oldest churches and has turned the old temples into churches. By the Armenians’ migration to Isfahan and, simultaneously, the establishment of the New Julfa during the reign of Shah Abbas the Great, the churches appeared in a different form. The construction of churches benefited ancient experiences whilst taking into consideration the Shah’s decree that new constructions should not conflict with the capital’s buildings. It seems that the previous studies on the New Julfa churches have not paid enough attention to the architectural and the cultural relations of the new context. Understanding the process of convergence between the Armenian religious architecture in New Julfa and the architecture of Isfahan, and its results could be applied in urban restoration and regeneration projects, especially in the Julfa neighborhood, which specifies the necessity of this research.
Research objectives: The current study aims to find out the morphological transformations of the physical-spatial structure of the main building of churches in New Julfa, considering the interaction between the architecture of New Julfa and Isfahan’s prominent architecture. The study tries to answer these questions: Which type is generative and the initiator of the progress of church building morphology? How the architecture of the main building of churches has been converging toward the prominent architecture of Isfahan within their morphology evolution process?
Research method: The research is carried out using an interpretive-historic method and the data is collected according to available documents and field observations.
Conclusion: The outcome of the research implies the principle of some kind of restriction in the form of the Armenian church building. The existence of a generative type and getting influenced by the architectural techniques of the Shah Abbas period is confirmed in the course of formal evolution. Compared to the Isfahan prominent architecture of this period, the morphological changes of the main building in the churches are indicative of a tendency to converge to the Iranian style. The St. George Church is the first church building with the features of Iranian architecture, which provides the possibility of subsequent physical-spatial developments. The physical-spatial structure of the church of Holy Mother of God and the Bethlehem church is comparable to the structure of Sheikh Lutfollah and Abbasi Jame’ mosques, which indicates how the physical-spatial structure of the generative type developed.
• Avdoyan, L. (2017). Review on vigilant powers: three churches of early medieval Armenia, by C. Maranci. The Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 68(3), 602-604.
• Carswell, J. (1968). New Julfa, The Armenian Churches and ther Buildings. Oxford: Clarendon.
• Ching, F. D. K., Jarzombek, M. M. & Prakash, V. (2006). A Global History of Architecture. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
• Currie, C. R. J. (1990). Gazetteer of archaic roofs in Herefordshire and Worcestershire churches, Vernacular Architecture, 21(1), 18-32.
• Durand, J. N. L. (2000). Precis of the Lectures on Architecture (Trans. David Britt). Los Angeles: The Getty Research Institute Publications Program.
• Garai, G. & Vukoszávlyev, Z. (2017). Supreme pastor of the church cares for the Hungarian church: church architecture of the Hungarian church during the first decade of john paul ii’s papacy, Periodica Polytechnica Architecture, 48(1), 53-57.
• Gellhardt, H. (2017). Armenien, Georgien, Notizen und Studien anlabich meiner Reise, Privatdruck: Potsdam.
• Greenwood, T. (2008). Sasanian reflections in Armenian sources. E-Sasanika, (3), Retrived from https://risweb.st-andrews.ac.uk/portal/en/researchoutput/sasanian-reflections-in-armenian-sources(deaf6950-08cb-49ed-91e8-83d49ac49f6c)/export.html
• Haghnazarian, A. (n.d.). The Monasteries of ST. Thaddeus: The Apostle And ST. Stepannos Nachavka (Z. Mnatsakanyan Trans.). Ed. L. Manoukyan, Page Maker: Susy Mashuryan.
• Kwun, J. B. & Whang, H. (2011). Morphological categorization and its role in design method, Architectural Research, 1(4), 11-18.
• Maranci, C. (2014). Building church in Armenia: Art at the borders of empire and the edge the canon. The Art Bulletin, 88 (4), 656-675.
• Maranci, C. (2015). Studies in the Visual Cultures of the Middle Ages, Vigilant Powers, vol. 8: Three Churches of Early Medieval Armenia, Turnhout: Brepols Publishers.
• Moudon, A. V. (1994). Getting to know the built landscape: typomorphology, In K. A. Franck & L. H. Schneekloth (Eds.), Ordering Space: Types in Architecture and Design, New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
• Oikonomou, A. (2012). Design and tracing of post-byzantine churches in the florina area, northwestern Greece. Nexus Network Journal, 14(3), 495-515.
• Panjikaran, S. & Vedamuthu, R. (2013). An evaluation of spatial organization of the church architecture of kerala during the sixteenth to seventeenth centuries. Journal of the Institution • of Engineers (India, Series A), 94(2), 123-130.
• Petruccioli, A. (1998). Exoteric, polytheistic fundamentalist typology, typological process and design theory, In (Ed.) A. Petruccioli, Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture. Massachusetts.
• Petruccioli, A. (1999). Aldo Rossi: An artist challenges typology. Paper presented at Acsa International Conference, Rome.
• Picon, A. (2000). Introduction to Precis of the Lectures on Architecture (David Britt Trans.). Jean-Nicolas-Louis Durand. Los Angeles: The Getty Research Institute Publications Program.
Pope, A. U. (n.d.). An historic outline (The Safavid Period). In Ph. Ackerman (Ed.), A Survey of Persian Art (vol. 3, pp.1165-1225). Tehran: Soroush.
• Repelewicz, A. & Madurowicz, Z. (2016). History of church design in Olszyna Lubańska. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, (10), 888-893.
• Simoni, P. & Hojat, I. (2016). Architecture of churches of Armenians in Tehran. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication. Retrived from http://www.tojdac.org/tojdac/VOLUME6-AGUSPCL_files/tojdac_v060AGSE173.pdf
• Sovik, E. A. (2009). Church architecture, A public language. Liturgy, 4(4), 82-89.
• Stroik, D. G. (2015). Church architecture since Vatican II. The Jurist: Studies in Church Law and Ministry, 75(1), 5-34.
• Walcher, H. A. (2001). Between paradise and political capital: the semiotics of Safavid Isfahan. In Middle Eastern Natural Environment (Bulletin 103, pp. 330-348). New Haven: Yale University press.