● Aryanpur Kashani, M. & Delgoshaei, B. (2015). The Aryanpur progressive English-Persian dictionary. Tehran: Jahan rayaneh digital publication and Etela Resani publications.
● Bentley, I, et al. (2014). Responsive environments: a manual for designers. Translated by Behzadfar, M. Tehran: Elm va Sanat University.
● Eghbali, R. & Hessari, P. (2013). Modular Approach and Prefabrication in Flexible Housing. Housing and the rural environment science-research journal, (142): 53-68.
● Eika, A. (2015). Physical integration and ethnic housing segregation, Proceedings of the 10th International Space Syntax Symposium, London.
● Einifar, A. (2013). Olguee baraye tahlil- e enetafpaziri dar maskan- e Sonnati- ye Iran [A pattern for analysing flexibility in the traditional housing in Iran]. Honar Ha- Ye Ziba, (13): 64-77.
● Ghafourian, M. & Aghaie, S. (2017). Bazshenasi va olaviatmandi- ye meyarha- ye enetafpaziri dar tarahi maskan- e apartemani- ye Iran [Recognizing and prioritizing indices of flexibility on designing apartment housing in Iran]. Soffeh, 26 (6): 41-64.
● Gharavi Al-Khansari, M. (2011). Opposition of stability and dynamism in flexibility of the work of architecture: Analyzing instances of contemporary flexible housing. Ph. D. thesis. University of Tehran: Fine Arts Faculty.
● Gibson, J. J. (1996). The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems. Boston: Hughton Mifflin.
● Guney, Y. I. (2005). Spatial types in Ankara apartments, In Van Nes A. (ed.). Proceedings of the 5th International Space Syntax Symposium, 13-17 June, Netherlands: Faculty of Architecture, Technology University, Delft.
● Heidary, A., Ghasemian asl, I. & Kiaie, M. (2017). Application of Quantitative Methods in Analyzing the Spatial Structure of Iranian Traditional Home Using Space Syntax (Case Study: Comparison of Houses in Yazd, Kashan and Isfahan). Journal of Studies on Iranian-Islamic City, 7 (28): 21-33.
● Habraken, N. J. (2008). Design for Flexibility. Building Research & Information, 36 (3): 290-296.
● Hill, C.W. L. & Jones, G.R. (1998). Strategic Management Theory. Boston : Houghton Mifflin Co.
● Hillier, B. & Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
● Hillier, B. (1985). The Nature of the artificials. Geoforum; Special Issue on the link between the nature and human sciences, (16): 163-178.
● Hillier, B., Hanson, J. & Graham H. (1987). Ideas are in things: an application of the space syntax methods to discovering house genotypes. Environment and Planning, B: Planning and Design, 14 (1): 363–385.
● Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajews ki, T. & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian, movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, (20): 29-66.
● Hillier, B. & Hanson, J. (2003). Actions of Architecture: Architects and Creative Users. London: Routledge.
● Hillier, B, (2007). Space is the Machine, A configurational theory of architecture Space Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
● Hosseini, A. & Sharifzadeh, S. A. (2014). Research on Limitations of Flexibility in Iranian Contemporary Housing. JHRE, (150): 29-32.
● Kiaei, M. (2017). Explaining The Physical-Functional Changes of Qajar Houses Over Time, Based on The Concept of Functional Efficiency (Case Study: Tabriz). Ph. D.
Thesis. Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.
● Khalou Esmaili, N. (2009). School Without Borders. M. A. thesis. Treatisein University, IslamicAzad University of Qazvin.
● Kronenberg, R. (2002). Houses in Motion: The Genesis, History and Development of the Portable Building. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
● Kronenberg, R., Scoates, Ch. & Betsky, A. (2003). Mobile Dwelling Unit. New York: Distributed art publishers.
● Kwon. S. & Sailer, K. (2015). Seeing and being seen inside a museum and a department store, A comparison study in visibility and co-presence patterns. In Proceedings of the 10th International Space syntax Symposium, London.
● Lang, J. (2002). Creating architectural theory: the role of the behavioral sciences in environmental design. Translated by Einifar, A. Tehran: University of Tehran.
● Ostuzzi, F., Jan, D., Lieven, D. C. & Jelle, S. (2017). From Design for One to Open-ended Design. Experiments on understanding how to open-up contextual design solutions. London: Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
● Peponis, J. (1985). The spatial culture of factories. Human Relations, (38): 357-390.
● Rapoport, A. (1977). Human aspects of urban form: Towards manenvironment approach to urban form and design. Oxford: Pergamon.
● Rismanchian, O. & Bell, S. (2010). The application of space Syntax in studying the structure of the cities. Honar-Ha-Ye Ziba, (43): 49-56.
● Seyyedein, S. A. & Aghli Moghaddam, K. (2015). The Effect of High-rise Construction on the Environment’s Robustness and Sustainability. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development journal, (15): 235-243.
● Soltanzadeh, H. (2017). Housing in the Iranian cultura, concepts and some of the applications. Tehran: daftar- e pajhuheshha- ye farhangi.
●Tavasoli, M. (1997). Principles and techniques of urban design. Tehran: Center for urbanization and architecture studies and researches in Iran.
● Till, J. & Schneider, T. (2005). Flexible housing: the means to the end. University of sheffield, uk: School of architecture.
● Till, J. & Schneider, T. (2007). Flexible housing: opportunities and limits. Journals Cambridge, arq , 9 (2): 157-166.
● Toker, U., Baran, P. K. & Mull, M. (2005). Sub-urban evolution: A cross-temporal analysis of spatial configuraion in an american town (1989-2002). 5th International Space Syntax Symposium, Delft.
●Wieland, A. & Wallenburg, C. (2012) Dealing with Supply Chain Risks. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42 (10): 877-905.
● Zandieh, M., Eghbali, S. R. & Hessari, P. (2011). The Approaches towards Designing Flexible Housing. BSNT, 1 (1): 95-106.