The Relationship between the Dweller and the Dwelling Revisited

Authors

1 Art University of Isfahan

2 Department of Fine Art, University of Tehran, Iran.

3 M. A. in Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Art University of Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

The houses of the modern and postmodern era have failed to provide a "friendly haven" for their dwellers. Some evidence shows that they even promote a sense of alienation and detachment among the dwellers. Available studies show that this problem could be related to a variety of factors such as the lack of harmony between the dwelling and the existential aspects of human being, the lack of meanings associated with such aspects and, the passivity of the dwellers.
Accordingly, the main question of this paper is how the dweller and dwelling are associated. To this end, this research aims at characterizing the house that encourages human to discover its hidden dimensions. Such a house promotes a reciprocal interaction with its dweller and it is like a mirror through which the dwellers can see themselves and reflect on what has been talked about.
This article argues that "the legibility of dwelling" and "the dweller’s interpretation of meanings" are helpful to establish the relationship between the dweller and the dwelling. The relevant studies and theories on th
 e topic were collected and analyzed to explore "the exchange of meaning between the dweller/dwelling". This study is an attempt to identify the factors contributing the relationship between the dweller and the dwelling. In this regard, based on the degree of legibility and meaning exchange, we proposed several levels of relationship between the dweller/dwelling:"Signification", "Meaning made by the dwellers" and "Meaning generated by the dwelling’". Finally, the characteristics of a dwelling which interacts with the dweller are introduced and categorized as "readable and familiar dwelling", "thought-provoking and imaginative dwelling" and "transcendental dwelling".

Keywords


Abedi Sarasia, A., Elmi Sola, M. S. & Elmi Sola, M. K. (2010). Investigating the Possibility of Access to the Intentions of the Author: A Critique of Anti-Intentional Hermeneutics and the Theory of Death of the Author. Philosophy and Theology, (85), (2): 169-194.
Ahmadi, B. (2001). The Structure and Interpretation of the Text. Tehran: Markaz Publication.
Alexander, C. (2007). Architecture and the Mystery of Immortality. Translated by Ghayumi Bidhendi, M. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University.
Antoniades, A. (2002). The Poetics of Architecture (Creation in Architecture). Translated by Ay, A. Tehran: Soroush.
Arbab Jolfaei, A. (2009). The Philosophical and Psychological Basics of Space Perception. Tehran: Khak Publication.
Bachelard, G. (2012). The Poetics of Space. Translated by Kamali, M. & Shirbacheh, M. Tehran: Roshngaran & Motale’at Zanan.
Bentley, I., et al. (2003). Answering Environments. Translated by Behzadfar, M. Tehran: Science and Industry University of Iran.
Canter, D. (1977).  A Psychology of Place. London: Architectural Press.
Croft, A. (2009). The Nurturing of Creativity in Childhood. Tehran: Rasesh.
Daneshgar Moghadam, G. & Eslampour, M. (2012). The Analysis of the Theory of Environment Potential from the Viewpoint of Gibson and its Feedback in the Studies on Human Being and Man-Made Environment. Utopia, (9): 73-84.
Daneshpour, H., Sepehri Moghadam, M. & Charkhchian, M. (2009). Explaining the Model of Attachment to Space and Investigating its Various Elements and Dimensions. Journal of Honar- Ha- Ye- Ziba, (38): 40.
Eftekharzadeh, S. (2013). From the Chaos of Perception to Knowledge of Architecture (A New Theory for the Creation of Anthropocentric Architecture according to Chaos Rules). Tehran: The Institute of Elm- e Me’mar.
Fried, M. (1963). Grieving for a Lost Home. In Duhl, L. J. (Ed.). The Urban Condition: People and Policy in the Metropolis. NewYork: Simon and Schuster.
Gharavi Alkhansari, M. (2009). The Flexibility of Architectural Work: Roots and Pathology in the Contemporary Era. Honar- Ha- Ye- Ziba, (40): 81-91.
Gruter, J. K. (2007). Aesthetics in Architecture. Translated by Pakzad, j. & Homayoun, A. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University.
Habermas, J. (1996). The Critique of Public Sphere. Translated by Bashirieh, H. Tehran: Ney Publication.
Haeri, M. (2009). House in culture & nature of Iran (The Study of the Architecture of Historical and Contemporary Houses for Compiling the Procedure and Criteria of House Designing). Tehran: The Research Center of Urban Planning and Architecture.
Hay, R. (1998). Sense of Place in Developmental Context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, (18): 5-29.
Heidegger, M. (2006). Being and Time. Translated by Jamadi, S. Tehran: Qoqnous.
Hojat, E. (2014). Tradition and Innovation in the Education of Architecture. Tehran: University of Tehran.
Lang, J. (2012). The Creation of Architecture Theory: The Function of Behavioral Sciences in Envioronment Planning). Translated by Einifar, A. Tehran: University of Tehran.
Low, S. M. & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment: a conceptual inquiry, In Low, S.M. & Altman, I. (Eds.). Place Attachment. NewYork: Plenum Press.
Lynch, Q. (2005). The Theory of City Form. Translated by Bahreini, H. Tehran: University of Tehran.
Messy, D. (1994). Space, Place and Gender. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Nadimi, H. & Owlia, Mohammad reza. (2014). The Proceedings of Ravagh - e nazar: 10 essays on architecture. Tehran: Text.
Nasri,  A. (2010). The Mystery of Text (Hermeneutics, readability and the logic of understanding religion). Tehran: Soroush.
• Noghrehkar, A.. Hamzehnezhad, M. & Forouzandeh, A. (2009). The Mystery of Immortality of Architectural Works (An Analysis of Modernist, Postmodernist and more General Approaches). Bagh- e Nazar, (12): 31-44.
Norberg Shultz, C. (2002). Architecture, Presence, Language and Space. Translated by Seyed Ahmadian, A. Tehran: The Institute of Architect-Publication.
Pakzad, J. (2007). Essays on the Concepts of Architecture and Urban Planning. Tehran: Shahidi.
Pallasmaa, J. (2010). Identity, Privacy and Phenomenology of the Notion of Home in Painting, Architecture and Cinema. Translated by Amjad, A. The Industry of Cinema Monthly, (97): 116-121.
Partoei, P. (2008). The Phenomenology of Space. Tehran: The Academy of Art.
Rappaport, A. (2004). The Meaning of Built Environment: An Approach on Non-Verbal Communication. Translated by Habib, F. Tehran: The Company of Urban Processing and Planning.
Rappaport, A. (2009). The Anthropology of Dwelling. Translated by Afzalian, Kh. Tehran: Herfe- ye Honarmand.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion Limited.
Soltani, M., Mansouri, A. & Farzin, A. (2012). Comparing the Role of Model and Experience-based Concepts in the Architecture Space. Bagh- e Nazar, (21): 3-14.
Walmsley, D. J (1990). Urban Living. Harlow UK: Longman Scientific & Technical.