Different Aspects of Popular Culture in Hossin Ali Zabehi`s Paintings

Document Type : Research Article

Author

Abstract

The present paper has allocated to analysis of the different aspects of popular culture in Zabehi`s paintings according to some social and cultural related contents like utopia, Carnival, and Grotesque. Relying on descriptive-analytical way, the main object of article, is to show how the popular culture emancipate from domination of ruling culture in the works of the artist. The paper aim at highlighting the formal characteristics of works to achieve two levels of explicit and implicit significations, in order to illustrate two kinds of culture: one is related to popular and another is produced by them. At the level of explicit signification, we rely on general characteristics of the artist’s paintings like deleting outlines and deformation of the objects in still lives. Also, applying the expressive colors can make distinguishable types of social characters according to their clothing and their gestures corresponding to their linguistic unusual titles of tableaus. In addition to it, the size of tableaus and artist`s action is the place of breaking the binary oppositions like popular and dominant culture. analysing the Implicit level leads to extract the profound themes with concentration on general characteristics and regarding the subject of artist`s paintings generally. by examining the character`s clothes, we can imagine ceremonies such as carnivals that individuals have equal opportunities in a classless utopia. The fast brushstrokes, with dry and physically colors relying on monstrous forces and color-sensing, display the features that resist to the forces of representative/objective rules of artistic works. This resistance makes painting able to have a potential energy that motivates, distorts and deformes the stable and immutable dimension of figures and forms of still lives. This aspect parallelly along with the implied fear of deformed and dried-up still lives, shows the grotesque space. All of the above mentioned features, based on the style of expressionism, have depicted paintings out of the representational/objective domination and direct emphasis on the obvious attributes of popular classes. These measures present the opportunities for realizing the ignored energies of popular culture. as a result these works by formal description and interpretive analysis of two levels of signification display two aspects of popular culture, first which is produced by concentration on their creative works, practices, rituals and ceremonies. The second, stems from their behaviors, habits and lifestyles. Thus, in contrast to the imitative and objective art, these works are aesthetic/sunjective ones because of their superiority over the dominant forms of artistic experiences.

Keywords


Adames, J. L. & Wilsom, Y. (2010).  The Grotesque in Art and Literature: Theological Reflection. Translated by Rasti, A. Tehran: Ghatreh press.
Ahmadi, B. (2013). The Text- Structure and Textual Interpretation. Tehran: Markaz press.
Ahmadi, B. (2014). A Dictionary of Marx`s Philosophical Terms. Tehran: Markaz press.
Bakhtin, M. (2015). The Dialogic Imagination. Translated by Poorazar, R. Tehran: Markaz press
Bennett, T.  (2009). Popular Culture and the Turn to Gramsci. In About Cultural Studies. Translated by Mohmmadi, J. Tehran:  Cheshmeh press.
Bloch, E. (2012). On expressionism. In Aesthetics and Politics: Critical Aesthetic Words by Debates. Edited by Jameson, F.  Translated by Mortazavi, H. Tehran: Jarf press.
Etehad, A. & Zabehi, H. (2015). Painting Is not Just the Imitation of Objectivity.  Iran newspaper, (5939): 7.
Frith, S. (2004). Popular Culture. In A Dictionary of Critical Theory. Edited by Payne, M. Tehran: Markaz Press.
Guter, E. (2014). Aesthetics A-Z. Translated by Abolghassemi, M. Tehran: Mahi.
Hakim, V. (2014). Pulpation of Image and the Amaze of Objects. Herfeh Honarmand, 12 (51): 102-104.
Makaryk, I. R. (2014). Encyclopedia of contemporary literary theory (approaches, scholars, Terms). Translated by Mohajer, M & Nabavi, M. Tehran: Agah publishing house.
Mashayekhi, A. (2016). Reflection on Focault`s methodology`s genealogy. Tehran: Naahid Press.
Midgley, M. (2015). Utopias, Dolphins and Computers: Problems in Philosophical Plumbing. Translated by Mohammadamini, M. Tehran: Farhange Nashre No.
More, T. (2006). Utopia. Translated by Ashori, D. & Afshari, N. Tehran: Kharazmi Press.
Pooke, G. & Newall, D. (2015). Art history: The Basics. Translated by Azari, H. Tehran: Hrfeh Nevisandeh press.
Rancière, J. (2014).  Aesthetics and it`s Dicontents. Translated by Farhad AkbarZadeh. Tehran: Omid saba press.
Todorov, T. (2014). Mikhail Bakhtin: the dialogical principle. Translated by Karimi, D. Tehran: Markaz press.
Thomson, P. (2011). The Grotesque (Critical Idiom). Translated by Taheri, F. Tehran: Markaz  press.
Townsend, D. (2014). Historical Dictionary of Aesthetics. Translated by Majidi, F. Tehran: Matn publisher.