Analyzing the Role of Constructional Violations in the Failure of Urban Development Plans of the Tehran Metropolis

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Ph. D. condidate in Urbanism, Tarbiat modares University, Tehran, Iran.

2 رئیس کمیسیون شهرسازی و معماری شورا اسلامی شهر تهران

3 مشاور کمیسیون شهرسازی و معماری

Abstract

Limitations of urban constructions in the form of rules and regulations with the aim of controlling city physical
development is the product of city development plans and documents. Actually, construction rules and regulations
in a metropolis like Tehran is the tool of performing urban development plans and development process in shortterm
urban projects and long-term development plans is controlled by means of these rules and regulations.
Therefore, how these rules and regulations are performed is a decisive factor in achieving goals and prospects of
urban development plans. Quantity and quality of construction regulations in Tehran from the first comprehensive
plan approved in 1970 to the strategic-structural plan in 2007 was changed along with the evolution of general
urban developments and special development policies in Tehran. Also, necessity of updating rules and regulations
of urban development is considered according to lack of full performance or low performance of many of the rules
and regulations of previous plans. A major part of challenges about non-implementation of these regulations can
be studied in the form of anomalies of constructional violations. This research analyzes and evaluates the way
of performing these regulations and status of constructional violations with the goal of analyzing challenges of
performing rules and regulations of urban development in Tehran metropolis using descriptive-analytical method.
Hence, four time intervals: the interval between performing regulations of first comprehensive plan of Tehran and
financial self-sufficiency of municipal, the interval between implementing density sales policy and modifying
regulations of Tehran, the interval between performing Amendment of planning regulations of Tehran and
announcing the rules of detailed and comprehensive plan of Tehran and after that are evaluated. Also, causes of
creation of constructional violations and their consequences in the failure of urban development plans were analyzed
and the results demonstrate that the factors such as physical field and limitations and natural tendencies of urban
development, underlying society and economy of city, defects of construction rules and regulations and inefficient
urban management system are the most important causes of constructional violations in Tehran metropolis.

Keywords


Aguilar, S. (2006). Crime Prevention in the EU, Master Thesis. University of Örebro: The department of Behavioral, Social and Legal Science.
Alnsour, J. & Meaton, J. (2009). Factors affecting compliance with residential standards in the city of Old Salt, Jordan. Habitat International, (33): 301–309.
Andalib, A., Masoud, M. & Yousefi azarabarghani, S. (2014). The Effects of Development of Tehran on Expansion of Worn-Out Textures (The Problems of the Neighborhood Haft Chenar – Beryanak from the Point of Expansion of Worn-Out Textures). Bagh- e Nazar, 11 (30): 3-14.
Arimah, C. & Adeagbo, D. (2000). Compliance with urban development and planning regulations in Ibadan, Nigeria. Habitat International, 24 (3): 279–294.
Azizi, M. M. & Shahab, S. (2013). Usage of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) as the Mechanism of Realization of Urban Development Plans (Case Study: The City Kashan). Urban Studies, (4): 1-14.
Beheshti Roy, M. (1993). Analyzing Structural Effects of Constructional Violations, Master Thesis. Tehran: University of Tehran.
Bissler, L. (2003). Fear of crime and social networks: a study of two local public housing complexes. Ph. D. thesis. Carolina: North Carolina State University.
Diyargah (Consultant Engineers). (2010). Reviewing and Correcting the Ways of Preventing from Constructional Violationsand Considering Them. Tehran: Urban Planning Section of Municipality of Tehran.
Dowall, D. E. (1991). A tale of two cities: A comparison of Karachi’s informal and formal housing delivery systems University of California at Berkley, Institute of urban and regional studies.
Farvacque, C., McAuslan, P., 1992. Reforming Urban Land Policies and Institutions in Developing Countries, Urban Management Program, Urban Management and Land, The world Bank.
Fekade, W. (2000). Deficits of formal urban land management and informal responses under rapid urban growth: an international perspective. Habitat International, 24 (2): 127–150. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com (13 March 2009).
Few, R., et al. (2004). Informal subdivision of residential and commercial buildings in Sao Paulo and Johannesburg: living conditions and policy implications. Habitat International, 30 (1): 427–442.
Ghadami, M., Lotfi, S. & Khaleghniya, K. (2013). Analyzing the Effects of Spatial Policies on Urban Spatial Structures by Emphasizing the Constructional Density, Case Study of Tehran. Urban Studies, (6): 89-103.
Habib Elahiyan, J. (2016). Importance and Position of stored lands of urban development and renovation of Tehran in new detailed and comprehensive plans, 2 (4): 4-6.
Huchzermeyer, M. (2004). From ‘‘contravention of laws’’ to ‘‘lack of rights’’: redefining the problem of informal settlements in South Africa. Habitat International, (28): 333–347.
Kahraman, S., Saati, A. & Misir, S. (2006). Effects of adding illegal storeys to structural systems. Sâdhanâ, 31 (5): 515-526.
Kapoor, M. & Blanc, D. (2008). Measuring risk on investment in informal (illegal) housing: theory and evidence from Pune, India. Regional Science and Urban Economics (38): 311-329. Available from: www.sciencedirect.com (16 April 2010).
Katz, P. (2004). Form First: The New Urbanist Alternative to Conventional Zoning. Available from: http://fltod.com/research/about_form_based_codes/form_first.pdf (accessed on 11 March 2016).
Melchert, L. (2007). The Dutch sustainable building policy: A model for developing countries?. Building and Environment, (42): 893–901.
Merriam- Webster dictionary. (2015). Available from: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bylaw Accessed on 1 January 2015.
Nallathiga, R. (2006). Development Planning or Development Control the Changing Focus of Master Plan of Mumbai. ITPI Journal, 3 (4): 28-35.
Ogu, V. (1999). Housing enablement in a developing world city: the case study of Benin City, Nigeria. Habitat International, 23(2): 231–248.
Pars Boum. (2012). Rules and Regulations of New Detailed Plan of Tehran. Tehran: Urban Planning and Architecture Section of Municipality of Tehran.
Pourahmad, A., Hataminejad, H. Hoseini, S. H. (2006). Pathology of Urban Development Plans of the Country. Geographical researches, (58): 167-180.
Potsiou, Ch. & Ioannidis, Ch. (2006). Informal Settlements in Greece: The Mystery of Missing Information and the Difficulty of Their Integration into a Legal Framework, 5th FIG Regional Conference, Accra, Ghana.
Sarkheyli, E. & Rafieian, M. (2010). Pathology of Incomes Derived from Constructional Violations in Municipality of Tehran. Tehran: Researches of Municipal Financial Conference.
Sarkheyli, E. & Rafieian, M. (2013). Assessing Tehran’s Urban Structure Effects on Non-Compliance with FAR Regulation. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 5(10): 223-238.
Sarkheyli, E. & Rafieian, M. (2012). Analyzing Tendencies of Violation of Constructing Building with Additional Constructional Density in Tehran. Urban Management, (20): 145-162.
Sarkheyli, E., Rafieian, M. & Bemaniyan, M. (2014). Analyzing the Relation Between Constructional Violation of Changing Usage and Spatial Structure of Tehran Using Spatial Regression Analysis. Architectural and Urban Planning, (12): 23-41.
Saeidniya, Ahad, 2013. Autopsy of Tehran Comprehensive Plan. Shahrnegar, (59): 14-29.
Tian, L. & Shen, T. (2011). Evaluation of Plan Implementation in the Transitional China: A Case of Guangzhou City Master Plan. Cities, (28): 11-27.
Van der Heijden, J. (2006). Enforcing Dutch Building Regulation, “Housing an expanding Europe, Theory, Policy, Participation and Implementation”, presented at the ENHR conference. Slovenia: Ljubljana, .
Zegarac, Z. (1999). Illegal construction in Belgrade and the prospects for urban development planning. Cities, 16(5): 365–370.