Background Factors in Contemporary Architecture Developments of Iran During the Second Pahlavi and Comparative Comparison with Turkey

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 null

2 Associate Professor of Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Architecture developments and urbanization in each territory reflects the social, political and cultural background of that country. On the other hand, achieving an understanding of the position of contemporary architecture in each territory in the global arena without understanding the developments of contemporary architecture of the countries with cultural, religious, regional and political similarities would not be possible. While the second Pahlavi era in Iran is the source of extensive developments, in the Middle East and in the contemporary years of this period (1940 to 1980) the political and social currents and therefore architecture in Turkey was formed with the same backgrounds with Iran.
Thus, this study seeks to identify factors affecting architecture in Iran and Turkey, and compares the contemporary architectural developments in the two countries. In this study, differences and similarities in the contributing factors and also the architectural developments in the two countries have been questioned. It has also been tried the contemporary architectural   developments in the two countries be possible through the field of comparative study. To facilitate the comparisons, the same time periods in Iran and Turkey have been introduced based on social and political developments and consequently the architecture, in the two countries. In this study, historical interpretation methods along with field study are used. The results of the study analyses the comparisons of various aspects of architecture developments and urbanization based on the mentioned periods and shows the overall similarity in compliance with the international currents and the other currents in the above-mentioned three periods, contemporary architectural rends in these two countries do not meet the objective.

Keywords


Aghahosseini, A. (2006). The role of Farah Pahlavies intellectual circle in contemporary social and political evolutions. Journal of administrative and economic sciences of Isfahan University, 2 (18): 113-142.
Ahmad, F.(2002).The making of modern turkey. London: Routledge.
Balamir, A. (2003). Architecture and exercise of identity: A profile of building culture in modern Turkey. Abadi quarterly Journal of architecture & urbanism, 13 (38): 20-43.
Batur, A. (2005). A Concise History: Architecture in Turkey during the 20 th Century. Ankara: Published by the chamber of Architects of Turkey.
Bozdogan, S. & Esra, A. (2012). Turkey: Modern architecture in history. London: Reaktion Books Ltd.
Bozdogan, S. & Kasaba, R. (2001). Rethinking Modernity and Identity in Turkey. Washington: University of Washing press.
Doroudgar, A. & Fahimfar, A. (2014). Recognition of Governmental Nationalist Policies Role in the Rise of National Architecture Movements in Turkey and Iran(1920-1950CE). American journal of SocialSciences. Art and Literature, 1 (1): 01-22.
Entekhabi, N. (2011). Nationalism and Modernity in Iran and Turkey. Tehran: Negare Aftab Publication.
Ghobadian, V. (2013). Styles & Concepts in Iranian contemporary architecture, second edition. Tehran: Elme Memar publication.
Mokhtari Taleghani, E. (2011). The heritage of modern architecture of Iran, first edition. Tehran: Cultural research bureau.
Rajabzadeh, A. & Fazeli, M. (2008). Social classes and democracy: the comparative historical analysis of Iran, Turkey and South Korea. Iranian Journal of Sociology (ISA), 8 (2): 112-141.
Sabatsani, N. (2013). An essay on some factors affecting contemporary architecture of Iran between 1941-1979. Armanshahr Scientific Journal, 6(11): 49-60.
Shaw, S. J. & Shaw, E.K. (2002). History of Ottoman empire and modern Turkey, Volume II: Reform, Revolution, and Republic: The Rise of Modern Turkey, 1808-1975. NewYork: Cambridge university Press.
Soheili, J. & Diba, D. (2010). How Government Systems Have Influenced the Emergence of Nationalist Architectural Movements in Iran and Turkey. Bagh- e Nazar, 7 (14): 27-44.
Tapan, M. (2005). International style: liberalism in architecture, In Modern Turkish architecture. Edited by Holod, R. & Evin, A. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Tekeli, I. (2005). The social context of the development of architecture in turkey, In Modern turkishArchitecture. Edited by Holod, R. & Evin, A. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Vaughn Findely, C. (2010). Turkey, Islam, Nationalism and modernity. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Yucel, A. (2005). Pluralism takes command: The Turkish architectural scene today, In Modern Turkish Architecture. Edited by Holod, R. & Evin, A. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Zurcher, E. J. (2004). Turkey: a modern history. London: I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd.