Analysing the impact of unplanned metropolitan growth on the peripheral natural environment: special reference to the metropolitan region of Tehran

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

null

Abstract

Statement of the problem: Metropolitan areas in the more and less developed countries of the world have formed essentially due to the utilization of economies of scale, and successively the metropolitan regions are formed through spatial-functional linkages of the metropolitan areas with their peripheral environments. This is while the increasing density and intensifying activities within metropolitan regions are not directly related and relevant to the principle of economies of scale; considering that the density and boundaries are determined and affected by population and ecological thresholds. Unplanned metropolitan growth and departure from the mentioned thresholds creates and accumulates spatial problems in metropolitan regions, especially in the peripheral natural environments. Many metropolitan regions have the experience of unplanned expansion and their damaged and problematic natural peripheral
environments. This have led to the production and reproduction of many urban and environmentally related problems, such as spatial confusion in economic, social, organisational and physical aspects that causes the exhaustion of resources and helps further the wasting of economic, social, and physical capital.
Purpose: Main purpose of this paper is to discuss the unplanned built environments formed by the unplanned growth of the metropolitan areas and metropolitan regions worldwide, and specifically the metropolitan area and the metropolitan region of Tehran. Moreover, the purpose is to confer the unplanned nature of these formed spaces and to consider the consequences of such urban growth. This is to empower and enable the metropolitan planning system and
mechanism in encountering the production and re-production of urban and natural environmental problems. Based upon the results of analysing the impact of unplanned metropolitan growth of Tehran upon its peripheral natural environment in this paper, proposals to establish an appropriate planning mechanism for this metropolitan region can be devised.
Methodology: This paper has a descriptive-analytical approach, which is devised to identify and analyse the emergence of problems in natural environments due to unplanned growth in the metropolitan region of Tehran. To achieve this, a three staged process has been
conceived and adopted: first; the theoretical foundations of the subject under study are reviewed, through following the experiences of some of the more and less developed countries. Second; the
paper further reviews the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Ecological Footprint (EF) methods in order to find an appropriate method and a set of appropriate indicators for analysing the impact of the growth of Tehran towards its peripheral natural environment. Third; application of the methods and indicators to analyse the ecological footprint of Tehran, to find the impact of unplanned growth of Tehran and its expansion towards the peripheral natural environment.
Achievement: The main outcome and achievement of this paper is to emphasis on establishing a planning and policy-making mechanism in the metropolitan region of Tehran, enabled to reduce, solve, and prevent the problems related to the natural environment.

Allen, A., da Silva, N. & Corubolo, E. (1999). Environmental problems and opportunities of the peri- urban interface and their impact upon the poor, peri- urban research team, development planning unit. London: University collage London.
Benfield, F. K., et al. (1999). Once there were green fields: how urban sprawl is undermining America’s environment, economy and social fabric. New York: Natural resources defense council.
Bhatta, B. (2010). Analysis of urban growthand sprawl from remotesensing data. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg.
Brody, S. (2013). The characteristics, causes, and consequences of sprawling development patterns in the United
States. Nature Education Knowledge, 4(5): 2.
Brueckner, J.K. (2000). Urban sprawl: Diagnosis and remedies. International Regional Science Review, (23): 160-171.
Canter, L. (1999). Pragmatic suggestions for incorporating risk assessment principles in EIA studies. Invited paper, The Environmental Professional, 15 (1): 125–138.
Canter, L. Sadler, B. (1997). A tool kit for effective EIA practice review of methods and perspectives on their application. International Association for Impact Assessment (IAIA): Oklahoma & Lincoln.
Carruthers, J. I. and Ulfarsson, G. F. (2002). Fragmentation and Sprawl: Evidence from Interregional Analysis. Growth and Change, 33(3): 312–340.
Caves, R.W. (2005). Encyclopedia of the city. Routledge: London & New York.
Cowan, R. (2005). The dictionary of urbanism. Streetwise press: Wiltshire.
Daneshpour, Z. A. (2014). An introduction to planning theories with special reference to urban planning theories. 3rd edition, Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University (SBU) publication.
Daneshpour, Z. A. Ebrahimnia, V. & Mahmoudpour, A. (2014). Devising a knowledge management framework for integrated policy-making in Tehran. Journal of Honar-Ha-Ye Ziba, 19 (1): 57-70.
Ewing, B., et al. (2010). Calculation Methodology forthe National Footprint Accounts. 2010 Edition. Oakland: Global Footprint Network.
Fazal, S. (2013). Land use dynamics in a developing economy. Springer Briefs in Geography. Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht.
Finn, G.A. (1989). Applications of expert systems in the process industry. In: G.G. Patry and D. Chapman (eds.). Dynamic Modeling and Expert Systems in Waste-water Engineering. London: Lewis Publishers.
Galster, G., et al. (2001). Wrestling Sprawl to the Ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept. Housing Policy Debate, 12(4): 681-717.
Global Footprint Network. (2009). Ecological Footprint Standards 2009. Oakland: Global Footprint Network. Available from: http://www.footprintstandards.org/
Groffman, P., et al. (2006). Ecological thresholds: the key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application? Ecosystems, 9 (1): 1–13.
Grove, W.R. (1967). Economies of scale in the provision of urban public services. Department of city planning, Massachusetts institute of technology: Massachusetts.
Heimlich, R. E. & Anderson, W. D. (2001). Developing the urban fringe and beyond: impacts on agriculture and rural land. report number 803. Washington, DC: USDA economic research service.
Hutchison, R. (2010). Encyclopedia of urban studies. California: Sage publications, Inc.
Krugman, P. R. Elizondo, R. L. (1996). Trade policy and the third world metropolis. Journal of development economics, 49(1): 137- 150.
Lohani, B., et al. (1997). Environmental Impact Assessment for Developing Countries in Asia. Vol. 1- Overview. Manila: Asian Development Bank (ADB).
Moore, D., et al. (2013). Methodology for calculating the ecological foorprint of California. 2013 Global Footprint Network. Available from: http://www.footprintnetwork.org/
European Communities. (2001). Guidance on EIA Scoping. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg.
Sasanpour, F. (2006). Sustainable development of metropolises, with reference to Tehran metropolise. Tehran: Tehran urban planning and research center.
Song, Y., Knaap, G. K. (2004). Measuring the effects of mixed land uses on housing values. Regional Science and Urban Economics, (34): 663-680.
Staley, S., Edgens, J., Mildner, G. (2000). A Line in the Land: Urban-growth Boundaries, Smart Growth, and Housing Affordability. Journal of Policy Study, (263).
Staley, S. Mildner, G. (1999). Urban-Growth Boundaries and Housing Affordability: Lessons from Portland. Research Public Policy Institute, policy brief No. 11.
Statistical center of Iran. (2009). Population and housing census 2006- general results of Tehran province. Tehran: Statistical center of Iran publication.
Statistical center of Iran. (2014). National portal for statistics. Available from: http://www.amar.org.ir/
Tacoli, C. (1998). Rural- urban interactions: a guide to the literature. Environment and urbanization, 10 (1): 147-166.
Tavallai, S., Sasanpour, F. (2009). Some aspects of Tehran`s ecological footprint. Journal of sustainable development, 2 (3): 187- 194.
Tiebout, C. (1960). Economies of scale and metropolitan governments. Journal of the review of economics and statistics, 42(4): 442-444.
Torrens, P. M. & Alberti, M. (2000). Measuring sprawl. Paper 27 ed. Center for advanced spatial analysis. London: University college London.
Tsai, Y. (2005). Quantifying urban form: compactness versus sprawl. Urban Studies, (42): 141-161.
UN. (2008). Handbook on the least developed country category: inclusion, graduation and special support measures. Committee for Development Policy (CDP) and United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA). New York: United Nations publications.
UNEP. (2002). Environmental impact assessment training resource manual. 2nd Ed,United Nations Environment Programme. Geneva: (UNEP)/ Economics and Trade Branch.
Wackernagel, M., et al (1999). National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics, (29): 375-390.
Woo, M. (2007). Impacts of urban containment policies on urban growth and structure. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University.
World resources institute. (1996). World Resources 1996-97. World resources institute, united nations environment programme, united nations development programme and the world bank. Available from: http://www.wri.org/publication/world-resources-1996-97
WWF.( 2002, 2004, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014). Living Planet Report. World Wide Fund for nature: Gland, Switzerland.
Zasada, I., et al. (2011). Peri-urbanisation and multifunctional adaptation of agriculture around Copenhagen. Danish Journal of Geography, 111 (1): 59- 72.