An Analytical Study on Contemporary Iranian Artworks Based on the Concepts and Functions of the “Appropriation”

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 M. A in Painting, Art Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor of Art Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Problem statement: Contemporary art has developed various outcomes and phenomena that do not comply with traditional artistic norms. One of these emerging phenomena in modern art is “appropriation,” which has piqued the curiosity of numerous artists. Artists today are also art consumers, in addition to their cultural activities. In this regard, “appropriation” may be seen as a contemporary art strategy for returning to the past, using pre-existing motifs, and reproducing works with new concepts. This approach has gained popularity among Iranian artists at the same time as it has in the Western world.
Research objective: This research aims to observe, examine, and evaluate contemporary Iranian art, mainly the works of modern Iranian painters, to investigate the idea of “appropriation” and identify its ways and functions with regard to Iranian contemporary art.
Research method: The descriptive-analytical method was used in this study, and data were gathered using field and desk research methodologies. First, we examined the similarities and overlap between this phenomenon in Iran and the Western world using definitions and studies associated with “appropriation” in Western art. Then, we highlighted contemporary Iranian artists whose work follows the “appropriation” principles.
Conclusion: According to the results, contemporary Iranian artists have predominantly accepted this method. As a consequence, artists have applied the notion of “appropriation” for a variety of purposes, three of which are noted below: 1- “Recycling the past within modern contexts,” 2- “Fostering intercultural dialogue and translation,” and 3- “Transposing the meanings of native artworks.” This study examines a range of appropriated works by contemporary artists under each of these functions. In the first function, artists’ attention has been drawn to the representation of the splendor of the past and the difficulties or concerns of contemporary man. In contrast, in the second function, the fusion of Iranian culture and art with renowned Western works has been highlighted. Finally, in the third function, we see previously recognized Iranian pieces distorted or tampered with, as well as new meanings added to them. Thus, some characteristics of works created through the “appropriation” strategy include modern and critical reproduction of images and works from the past to develop new meanings, link the past to the future, and refer to or retell the past.

Keywords


Ajand, Y. (2010). Negargari-ye Iran (Pajoheshi dar tarikh-e naghashi va negargari-ye Iran [Iranian Miniature (A Research on the History of Iranian Painting and Miniature)]. Tehran: The Organization for Researching and Composing University textbooks in the Humanities [SAMT].
Baghban Maher, S. & Gholamian, B. (2010). Esalat-e athar-e honari [The Authenticity of Artworks]. Etelaat-e Hekmat va Marefat,  5(10), 44-49.
Baharloo, A. (2014). About Rosalind Krauss. Tandis, (287), 14-15.
Benjamin, W. (1998). The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction (O. Nikfarjam, Trans.). Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, 8(3), 210-225.
Benjamin, A. (2005). Walter Benjamin and Art. London, New York: Continuum.
Bocola, S. (2008). The Art of Modernism (R. Pakbaz et al. Trans.). Tehran: Farhange Moaser.
Davies, P., Hefricher, J. & Roberts, S. (2009). Jansons history of art: the western tradition (F. Sojoodi, Trans.]. Tehran: Farhangsara-ye Mirdashti.
Faraji, Z. (2011). Examining the Effect of Postmodernism on Iranian Paintings (Unpublished Master Thesis in Painting]. Faculty of Arts and Architecture, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
Fenzel, C. (2007). Still Life with “SPARK” and “SWEAT”: The Copyright Ability of Contemporary Art in the United States and United Kingdom. Arizona Jornal of International & Comparative Law, 24, 551-552.
Gardner, H. (2002). Art through the Ages. Tehran: Agah.
Gharebaghi, A. (1999). Genealogy of postmodernism5. Golestaneh, (5), 12-47.
Gharebaghi, A. (2000a). Mike Bidlo: Honar-e naghl-e ghol [Mike Bidlo: The Art of Citation]. Golestaneh, (21), 60-63.
Gharebaghi, A. (2000b). Tabarshenasi-ye postmodernism (12), payan va marg-e honar (2) [Genealogy of Postmodernism 12: The end and the Death of Art 2]. Golestaneh, (20), 17-24.
Ghiasi, Z. (2016). Copy, Forgery, and Appropriation. Tehran: Avam Sara.. 
Halimi, M.H. (2004). Negareshi bar shive-ha-ye naghashi [A Review of Painting Styles]. Tehran: Ehyae Ketab.
Jahangir, N. (2013). Appropriation (Unpublished Master Thesis in Painting). Faculty of Ars, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.
Janson, A. F. (2002). Postmodernism and the Postmodern Art (M. Gooya, Trans.). Tehran: Asre Honar.
Johannes, L.R. (2011). Copyright and Art Work in South Africa. Retrieved Jun 23, 2021, from: www.wired space. Wits.ac.za.
Kamali, Z. & Akbari, M. (2008). Walter Benjamin and the Art of Reproduction. Philosophical Investigations, (14), 125- 146.
Kashmirshekan, H. (2017). Contemporary Iranian Art. Tehran: Nazar.
Krauss, R. E. (1986) The Originality of the Avante-Garde and Other Modernist Myths. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lucie- Smith, E. (2001). Movements in Art since 1945: Issues and Concepts (A. Sami Azar). Tehran: Nazar.
Lynton, N. (2003). The Modern Art. (A. Ramin, Trans.). Tehran: Ney.
McCoy, C. (2017). Naghderooz. Retrieved  May, 2, 2018, from : Naghderooz.com
Millet, C. (2017). Contemporary Art History and Geography (M. Nonahali, Trans.). Tehran: Nazar.
Mirizzi, G. (2011). Appropriation in Art. Retrieved May, 12, 2018  from: https://gianfrancomirizzi.wordpress.com/
Mahmoud Sabzi. (2013). Tandis. Retrieved May, 30, 2018  from: https: //tandismag.com/tag.
Pakbaz, R. (2002). Dar jostojo-ye zaban-e no [Looking for a New Language]. Tehran: Negah.
Pakbaz, R. (2004). Naghashi-ye Iran (az dirbaz ta emroz) [Iranian Painting (A Historical Review)]. Tehran : Zarin va Simin.
Panart Editorial. (2018). Allegorical Angles and Sublime Art of Hojat Amani. Retrieved 9 July, 2018, from: Panart.ir/fa/ 
Rowe, H. A. (2011). Appropriation in Contemporary Art. Inquiries Journal, 3(06). Retrieved from http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1661/appropriation-incontemporary-art.
Sadegh Panah, B. (2011). Self-Reference in Contemporary Photography (Unpublished Master Thesis in Art Studies]. Faculty of Art, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Sami Azar., A. (2012). The History of Art in Contemporary Era, Conceptual Revolution. V. 2. Tehran: Nazar Cultural Research Institute and Publishing.
Sami Azar., A. (2016). Art, Modern-- 20th century -- Addresses, essays, lectures. Tehran: Nazar Cultural Research Institute and Publishing.
Shamkhani, M. (2017). The Dictionary of Art. Tehran: Talai.
Shehani, B. (2014). Didar az naghashi-ha-ye Mehrdad Mohebali dar negarkhaneye Etemad [Visiting the paintings of “Mehrdad Mohebali” in Etemad Gallery].  Etemad Newspaper, No. 10/3206.
Stein, R. (2003). Walter Benjamin (M. Madadi, Trans.). Tehran: Akhtaran.
Stokes, S. (2001). Art and Copyright. North America and Canada: Hart Publishing Oxford and Portland, Oregon.
Taheri, M. (2016). The Application of the Element of “Appropriation” in Commercials Ads. Iranian Scientific Association of Visual Arts, 1 (1), 81-97.
Torsen, M.A. (2006). Beyond Oil on Canvas: New Media and Presentation Formats Challenge International Copyright law`s Ability to Protect The Interest of The Contemporary Artist, Art Antiquity, 3(1), 45-70.
Wilder, J. B. (2016). Art history For Dummies (S. Boroomand, Trans.). Tehran: Avande Danesh.
Yasrebi, A. (2011). Andy Warhol. Tehran: Nazar.
Zahedi, M. & Sharifzadeh, Sh. (2016). The Legal Position of Contemporary Art in Literal and Artistic Works Law. Private Law Research, 4 (15), 53-83.