Semiotic Analysis of Barbie Dolls Using Roland Barthes’ Mythologies

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Faculty of Art and Architecture, University of Mazandaran , Babolsar, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Problem statement: In the present era, with the advancement of technology in design and construction, the toy industry has entered a new phase of mass production with a significant profit for the owners of this industry. In addition, branding and advertising Barbie dolls among the different toys have caused them to stand at the top of the supply and demand chain in the world market. The repetition of Barbie characters over several generations has made it a collective memory for users, especially girls. Therefore, most children and adults know this character and have used it in their games and plays during their growth time.
Research objective: This research investigates the functional effect of this best-selling toy in the formation of modern myths and the strengthening of the bourgeoisie around the world. In this regard, emphasizing Roland Barthes’ theory of mythologies, the human-object relationship is studied in the case of Barbie dolls. The objectives of the present research are to identify the signs related to the Barbie doll myth based on Roland Barthes’ theory and to find how the Barbie doll myth has been formed.
Research method: The research method used is descriptive-analytical. The bibliographic and Internet data were used as the research sample. In the first phase of the research, Barbie’s implications were mythologized to recognize the mythological language of the dolls as a meta-language. In the next phase, according to Barthes’ mythological criticism, meta-meta-language layers were identified and introduced. 
Conclusion: The research results show that mythologies have been used in the design, production, and sale of Barbie dolls. There are common implicit messages in the advertising and branding of Barbie dolls. They have hidden layers that affect the consumers’ subconscious and temporarily lead them to meta-Barbie consumption. Moreover, in the demythologization process, Barbie’s domination turned out to include a wave of political and commercial services as well as the film industry and multimedia.

Keywords


Ahmadian, R., Sharafieh, M. & Mohammadian Bishe, I. (2016). San’at-e Asbab-Bazi-ye Iran, Forsat-ha va Chalesh-ha [Iran toy industry: Opportunities and challenges]. Tehran: Noban Publications.
Amoian, F. & Mahmoudi, F. (2018). Objectification Process of Product Design in Contemporary Society: Culture Industry Theory (Case Study: Cell Phone). HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA; HONAR-HA-YE-TAJASSOMI, 24(1), 125-134.
Angus, I. (2016). Facing the Anthropocene: Fossil Capitalism and the Crisis of theEarth System, New York: Mothly Review Press.
Asa Berger, A. (2011). Ads, Fads and Consumer Culture: Advertising’s Impact on American Charater and Soiety. London: Romman & Littlefield.
Barthes, R. (1968). Elements of Semiology.AnnetteLavers and Colin Smith. New York: Hill & Wang.
Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies (A. Lavers, Trans.). New York: Hill & Wang.
Bashir, H. & Hoseini, S. B. (2012).  Impact Of Characterization Modeling Function On The Reasoning, Heart And Limbs Of The Audience; Case Study Of Barbie Doll.   RELIGION & COMMUNICATION, 19(1), 5-35.
Bennett, A. (2007). Culture and everyday life  (L. Javafeshani & H. Chavoshian, Trans.). (1nd ed.). Tehran: Akhtaranbook Publications.
Botz-Bornstein, T. (2012). Barbie and the Power of Negative Thinking: Of Barbies, Eva-Barbies and I-Barbies. Post Modern Cultural Sound, Text and Image, (9), 1552-5112.
Brannon, L. (2005). A Human-Centered Perspective on Interaction Design. London: Springer.
Budiyanto, A. (2009). Playing with Piety: The Phenomenon Of Indonesian Muslim Dolls. EXPLORATIONS a Graduate Student Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, (2), 1-14.
Carroll, N. (1985). Formalism and Critical Evaluation. In P. McCormik (Ed.), The Reasons of Art. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press
Chandler, D. (2008). Semiotics: Basics (M. Parsa, Trans.). Tehran: Institute of Islamic Culture and Art.
Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics (Advances in Semiotics). Bloomington, IN & London: Indiana University Press.
Eco, U. (2019). On Ugliness (H. Bina & K. Taghizadeh Ansari, Trans.). Tehran: Academy of Arts.
Gaut, B. (2016). The Routledge companion to aesthetics (Encyclopedia of Aesthetics) (M. Sane’i Darebidi, A. A. Nojoumian, S. Ahmadzadeh, B. Mohaghegh, M. Ghasemian & F. Sasani, Trans.). Tehran: Farhangestan-e Honar.
Khani Hanjani, N. & Alvandi, H. (2017). Affective Factors on Girl’s Tendency to Mannequinism Case Study: The Particular impact of Barbie Dolls, among others on the Girls Tendency toward Mannequinism. Pazuheshname-ye Zanan [Women’s Studies], 8(3), 19-45.
Krik, D. (2002). The Social Constraction of the Body in Physica Education and Sport. London: Taylor & Francis.
Lowe, G. F. (2016). Managing Media Firms and Industries. London: Springer.
Madadpour, M. (2009). Falsafe-ha-ye Postmodern-e Gharbi: Goriz va Gozar az Modernite [Escape from modernity: Western postmodern philosophies]. Tehran: Soore-ye Mehr Publications.
Mire-Beigi, S. V. (2016). Criticism and Myth: The semiological analysis animation Wall-E.. Cultural Studies & Communication, 12(42), 89-113.
Moriaty, M. (1991). Roland Barthes. Cambridge: Polity.
Motlaghzadeh, R. (1999). Vasayel-e Bazi-ye Koodakan [Children’s play equipment]. Tehran: Tehran Beautification Organization.
Nagamachi, M. (2017). Innovations of Kansei Engineering. Tokyo: Taylor & Francis Group.
Najafabadi, E. & Nazeri, A. (2017). The Myth and Modern Cinematic Superhero-Making from the Perspective of Cultural Studies. PAZHUHESH-E HONAR, 7(13), 31-42.
Namvar Motlaq, B. (2014). Barthes’ mythologies; mythology of a semiotician. Naghd-Name Honar, 1(6), 161-184.
Namvar Motlaq, B. (2018). Daramad-i bar Ostoureh-Shenasi: Nazarie-ha va Karbord-ha [An introduction to mythology: Theories and applications]. Tehran: Sokhan Publications.
Paananen, A. (2017). The Development of the character of Lara Croft as manifested in the dialogue between her and other characters in the Tomb Raider reboot video game. Retrieved august 19, 2021, from http://jultika.oulu.fi/files/nbnfioulu-201706072625.pdf
Padmanugraha, A. S. (2007). Woman’s Values in Society as Reflected in Marge Piercy’s “Barbie Doll”. DIKSI, 1 (14), 48-56.
Roy, O. (2004). The Globalized Islam The Search for a New Ummah. NY: Colombia University Press.
Shibagaki, A. (2007). The Barbie Phenomenon in Japan. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis in Folklore, Department of Folklore and Ethnomusicology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
Solomon, M. R. (2013). Consumer Behavior: Buying, Having, Being. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Toffoletti, K. (2007). Cyborgs and Barbie Dolls: Feminism, Popular Culture and the Posthuman Body. London and New York: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd.
Urla, J & Swedlund, A. C. (2007). The Anthropometry of Barbie: Unsettling Ideals of the Feminine Body in popular Culture. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Wallack, H. (2016). Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc. 296 F.3D (9th Cir. 2002). DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, 2 (12), 477-494.
Yaqin, A. (2007). Islamic Barbie: The Politics of Gender and Performativity. Fashion Theory, 2/3 (11), 173-188.