Criteria Affecting the Preservation of the Authenticity in Restoration of Sadaghiani’s House in Tabriz

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Professor of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran.

2 Ph.D. Candidate in Islamic Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran.

3 Master of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urbanism, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

Problem Statement: Evidence of history and protection of historical monuments is based on authenticity; if the revival of the monuments is not based on the preservation of its originality, the historical identity of monuments has been damaged and it can no longer be considered historical.
Therefore, In the process of restoration the authenticity of the work should be one of the priorities of the project executors. Sadaghiani House belongs to Qajar and Pahlavi period. The buildings and spaces of this historic complex have changed over time, and parts of it have been separated or destroyed, which needed to be rebuilt for re-use.
Research question: What are the effective and authentic indicators in the restoration of Sadeghiani historical house in Tabriz?
Scopes of study: Regarding to the damages and changes in the structure of the Sadaghiani House due to disproportionate urban development and impacts of war and lack of proper preservation during the reconstruction process, This monument required intervention to change the physical structure of some parts of the house.
Methodology: The research method is applied research which has been done by qualitative research method and content analysis strategy and has been done in two general sections of literature review and field surveys. The literature review was done by studying documents and historical images to recreate the building in order to investigate the issue of authenticity.
The reason for choosing Sadaghiani House is due to many destructions during the urban development and the effort to change the use and recreate the destroyed parts by the executors.
Conclusion: What results from the analysis of the authenticity indicators of this house in 5 restoration periods, Despite major renovations and physical restructuring in parts of the building, Considering the indicators of apparent intact (form), stability of symbolic values,

Keywords

References

Ahmadi, H. & Vatandoost, R. (2017). Recognition of the value and value factors in the transformation of views on the protection of Cultural Heritage in present century. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA, 21 (4), 39-50.
Akieda,Y.I. (2001). Translation of Charter for Conservation of Historic Towns and Settlements  of Japan the Machinami Charter. Tokyo: Tokyo National University of Fine Arts and Music.
Andrews, T.D. & Buggey, S. (2008). Authenticity in Aboriginal Cultural Landscape, In Waite, Diana. (Ed.). APT Bulletin The Journal of Preservation Technology, 39(2-3), 63-71.
Araoz, G.F. (2008). World-Heritage Historic Urban Landscapes: Defining and Protecting Authenticity. APT Bulletin, 39, 33-37.
Bina Motlagh, M. (2006). Nazm va  Raz [Order and mystery]. Tehran: Hermes.
Brandi, G. (2013). Theory of Restoration (P. Hanachi, Trans.). Tehran: University of Tehran.
Damyar, S. & Nari Ghomi, M. (2012). The Comparative Study of the Space Concept in the Vernacular Architecture and Modern Architecture. HONAR_HA_YE_ZIBA, 17 (1), 65-72.
Denslagen, W. (2009). Romantic Modernism: Nostalgia in the World of Conservation. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Ehteshami, A. &  Soltaninejad, M. (2020). The Concept of Authenticity in Restoration Analysis of Monitoring and Restoration in the Authenticity Preservation of Cultural Heritage. Advances in Anthropology, 10(2), 81-96.
Fadaei Nezhad, S. & Eshrati, P. (2015). Analysis of Authenticity Recognition Components in Cultural Heritage Conservation. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA, 19 (4), 77-86.
Feilden, B. M. & Jokilehto, Y. (2003). Evaluation for conservation. Haft Shahr, 1(12-13), 17-25.
Ford, E. (1997). The Theory and Practice of Impermanence: Illusion of Durability. Harvard Desig  Magazine, (3).
Giombini, L. (2018). But is this really authentic? Revising authenticity in restoration philosophy. Lebenswelt. Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience. (12),21-35.
Habibi, M. & Maghsoudi, M. (2011). Urban Renovation. Tehran: University of Tehran.
Hajipour Shoushtari, A. (2007). Authenticity seal of UNESCO for handicrafts. Goljaam, (6-7), 155-171.
Hidaloo. (2008). Report on the process of registration of immovable cultural heritage in Iran, from nature to realization. Consulting engineers of the eighth millennium Hidaloo. Retrieved from https://hidalou.com/#home.
Jokilehto, J. & Stovel, H. (1995). Viewpoints: The Debate on Authenticity. ICCROM Newsletter, 21, 6-8.
Jokilehto, J. (2006). Considerations on authenticity and integrity in world heritage context. City & Time, 2(1), 1-16.
Jokilehto, Y. (2016). A History of Architectural Conservation (M. H. Talebian, Kh. Bahari, Trans.). Tehran: Rozaneh.
Larsen, K. E. (1995). A note on the authenticity of historic timber buildings with particular reference to Japan. In Proceedings of the 8th ICOMOS International Wood Committee (IIWCC), Kathmandu, Patan, and Bhaktapur, Nepal.
MacCannell, D. (1973). Staged Authenticity: Arrangements of Social Space in Tourist Settings. American Journal of Sociology, 79(3), 589-603.
Maddah, M., Sanadi, M. & Ahmadi, M. (2018). The place of urban restoration in sustainable urban development and interaction with new structures in the historical context. Architecture Journal of Ivane charsou, 4, 151-164.
Masoud, M. & Hojat, E. & Nasekhian, S. (2013). Authenticity Status In Context Restoration. ARMANSHAHR, 5(9), 271-283.
Mitchell, N. (2008). Considering the Authenticity of Cultural Landscape. APT Bulletin, 39(2-3), 25-32.
Motamedmanesh, M. (2016). Authenticity and Restoration: The Benefits of  Historical Studies on Re-Examining the Implemented Restorations in Persepolis. Arts, 5(1), 2.
Naghizadeh, M. (2000). Rabete-ye hoviat-e sonat-e me’mari-ye Iran ba modernism va nogeraei [Identity Of «Iranian Architecture» And «Modernism»]. HONAR-HA-YE-ZIBA, (7), 79-91.
Nari Ghomi, M. & Abbaszadeh, M. J. (2014). he Guest at Home: a Comparative Study between Iran and the West at the Threshold of Modern Age (Case Study: Qajar Houses in Tabriz). Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture, 3 (1), 109-93.
Nili, R., Diba, D. & Mahdavinejad, M. (2018 The review and reflection of Authenticity Concept in Iranian contemporary architecture (Case study: an eclectic selection of outstanding Iranian contemporary architecture). Journal Of Environmental Science And Technology, 19, 1-13.
Norberg-Schulz, C. (1991). Genius Loci: Towards a Phenomenology of Architecture. London: Studio Visa.
Pedram, B., Oulia, M. R. & Vahidzadeh, R. (2011). Assessing the authenticity in the process of preserving Iranian historical monuments: the need to pay attention to the continuation of the indigenous culture of artistic creation. Maremat & Me’mari-e Iran, 1 (2), 1-16.
Philokyprou, M. (2015). Continuities and Discontinuities in the Vernacular Architecture. Athens Journal of Architecture, 1(1), 20-30.
Raahil Ghavami, F. (2007). Form and Content in Plato’s World. Kimia-ye-Honar, 1(4), 17-34.
Rashidi, A. (2011). Modernity and cultural Authenticism: a comparative study between Russia and Iran. Politics, 41(1), 115-134.
Rossler, M. (2008). Applying Authenticity to Cultural Landscapes. APT Bulletin, 39(2-3), 47-59.
Salmani, A., Rahimi, M.H. & Khakzand, M. (2016). Analysis of the Importance, Priority and Originality of Open Space in the Mosque. Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture, 3(4), 34-48.
Scott, D. A. (2015). Conservation and authenticity: Interactions and enquiries. Studies in Conservation, 60(5), 291-305.
Smith, N. & Williams, P. (eds.) (1986). Gentrification of the City. London: Allen and Unwin.
Soleimani, M., Tavalaee, S., Karimipour, Y. & Aghayeezadeh, I. (2012). An Introduction on the Effects of Originality of Deteriorated Textures of Tehran (A Case Study: Moftabad District). Journal of Studies on Iranian- Islamic City, 2(5), 67-78.
Shoberi Zanjani, Sh. & Dehghani, S.A. (2015). Comparative Study of Individual Character Condition in Industrial Designs Law and Its Comparison with the Condition of Originality. Comparative Law Researches, 19(2), 75-96.
Stovel, H. (1998). Risk Preparedness: A Managment Manual for World Cultural Heritage. Roma: iccrom / unesco whc / icomos.
Tiesdell,S., Oc, T. & Heath, T. (2000). Revitalising Historic Urban Quarters (S. Sarikhani, Trans.). Shiraz: Navid-e Shiraz.
Van Balen, K. (2008). The Nara Grid: An Evaluation Scheme Based on the Nara Document on Authenticity. Association for Preservation Technology International (APT Bulletin), 39(2 & 3), 39-45.
Weiler, K. & Gutschow, N. (2016). Authenticity in Architectural Heritage Conservation. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
World Heritage Centre (WHC). (2008). Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World Heritage Convention. UNESCO, World Heritage Centre.
Zancheti, S.M; Flaviana, L. & Piccolo, R. (2009). Judging the authenticity of the city. In N. Stanley-Price & J. King (Eds.), Conserving the Authentic: Essays in Honour of Jukka Jokilehto (pp. 163-168), Rome: ICCROM Conservation Studies 10, ICCROM.
Zebardast, E. & Emami, S.M. (2012). The Evaluation of Urban Development Plans Based on Interconnectedness and Connectivity Principle using AHP Model Case Study: Imam Ali Square Revitalization Plan in Isfahan. Motaleate Shahri, 3(11), 19-36.
Zeimaran, M. (2005). Falsafe-ye honar-e Arastoo [Aristotle’s philosophy of art]. Tehran: Farhangestan-e Honar.
 
The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar
Volume 19, Issue 108
June 2022
Pages 91-108

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics