Redefining the Ontology of Place as the Urban-Relational

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. candidate in Urban Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate professor, School of Architecture and Environmental Design, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Problem statement: The contemporary metropolis faces two sometimes conflicting roles through the discursive and paradigmatic developments in the world: role-playing at the national/ transnational level and meeting local-level expectations. Similarly, and because of the multiplicity and diversity of relations between these two levels and the different subjects underlying these dual roles, the ontological definition of “place” in this metropolis has to be changed. Here, we are considering a conception of the existence of the place in which it can adopt the aforementioned complex communications and the probable and unseen conflicts within it as a quasi-object (the contained), and manage it as a quasi-subject (container) and accommodate it.
Research objective: Redefining the ontology of place in such a way that it can mediate as an intermediate layer, i.e. “the urban-relational” between these two role-playing levels: place as a quasi-object / place as a quasi-subject.
Research method: The research paradigm focuses on post-positivist schemata and the post-structuralism approach, and follows the ontology of place as an urban-relational entity in today’s metropolis. The method of this research is qualitative and its type is developmental-exploratory. This research seeks to present a new ontology of the concept of place in metropolis through the review of library documents and the description, analysis, and extension of ideas and theoretical approaches.
Conclusion: place as a quasi-object/ quasi-subject must be a communicative mediator (the urban-relational) between the two different levels of role-playing, thereby regulating the communications of multiple and sometimes heterogeneous subjects and adjust conflicts between them. The mediation coordinates of this urban-relational intermediate layer allow for four spectral states for the level of place-ness: towards minimal place-ness; towards maximal place-ness; towards some extent of place-ness; the probability of anarchy and disorder.

Keywords

References

Askai, M. & Behzadfar, M. (2016). Be-souye yek goune-shenasi-ye olgouvare’i dar me’mari va shahrsazi [Towards a typology of paradigm in architecture and urban planning]. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities, 22(89), 195-228.
Augé, M. (2009). Non-Places: Places Introduction to an Anathropology of Supermodernity (M. Farhoumand, Trans.). Tehran: Daftar-e Pazhouhesh-ha-ye Farhangi.
Castells, M. (1996). Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture: The Emergence of Networking Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2006). Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture: The Emergence of Networking Society (A. Aligholian & A. Khakbaz, Trans.). Tehran: Tarh-e No.
Debord, G. (1961). Perspectives for Conscious Alterations in Everyday Life. Paris: The Internationale Situationniste.
Debord, G. (1967). The Society of the Spectacle (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). New York: Zone Books.
Debord, G. (2006). Report on the Construction of Situations. Retrived from http://www.bopsecrets.org/SI/report.htm
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dovey, K. (2014). Incremental urbanism: the emergence of informal settlements. In T. Haas & K. Olsson (Eds.), Emergent Urbansim (pp. 45-53). London & New York: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (2016). Folie et Déraison: Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique (Trans. F. Valyani). Tehran: Hermes.
Foucault, M. (2018a). L’archéologie du savoir (N. Sarkhosh & A. Jahandideh, Trans.). Tehran: Nashr-e Ney.
Foucault, M. (2018b). Surveiller ET punir:  Naissance de la prison (N. Sarkhosh & A. Jahandideh, Trans.). Tehran: Nashr-e Ney.
Foucault, M. (2018c). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lecture at the Collège de France (R. Najafzadeh, Trans.). Tehran: Nashr-e Ney.
Golkar, K. (2001). Components of urban design quality. Soffeh, 11(32), 38-65.
Goonewardena, K. (2015). Critical urbanism; space, design, revolution (R. Basiri Mojdehi, Trans.). In T. Banerjee & A. Loukaitou-Sideris (Eds.), Companion to Urban Design. Tehran: Tahan.
Gramsci, A. (1983). Lettere dal Carcere‬ (M. Alavinia, Trans.). Tehran: Agah.
Gramsci, A. (2017). State and civil society. In Selections from the prison notebooks (A. Milani, Trans.). Tehran: Akhtaran.
Haraway, D. (1991). A cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In D. Haraway (Ed.), Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (pp. 81-149). London: Free Association Books.
Harvey, D. (1985). The Urbanization of Capital: Studies in the History and Theory of Capitalist Urbanization. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Harvey, D. (2016). Social Justice and the City (M. R. Ha’eri, Trans). Tehran: Tehran Municipality ICT Organization.
Harvey, D. (2017). Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution (K. Kalantari & P. Sedaghat, Trans.). Tehran: Agah.
Heidegger, M. (1971). Poetry, Language, Thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Law, J. (2000). On the subject of the object: narrative, technology, and interpellation. Configurations, 8(1), 1–29.
Lefebvre, H. (1992). The Production of Space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lefebvre, H. (2000). Writings on Cities (E. Kofman & E. Lebas, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc..
Lefebvre, H. (2003). The Urban Revolution (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press
Madanipour, A. (1996). Design of Urban Space: An Inquiry into a Socio-Spatial Process (F. Mortezayi, Trans.). Tehran: Sherkat-e Pardazesh-e Barnamerizi-e shahri.
Madanipour, A. (2014). Creativity, diversity and interaction: urban space and place-making. In T. Haas & K. Olsson (Eds.), Emergent Urbansim (pp. 37-43). London & New York: Routledge.
Massey, D. (1994). Space, Place and Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Massey, D. (2005). For Space. London: Sage.
Metzger, J. (2013). Raising the regional Leviathan: A relational-materialist conceptualization of regions-in-becoming as publics-in-stabilization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(4), 1368-1395.
Metzger, J. (2014). The subject of place: staying with the trouble. In T. Haas & K. Olsson (Eds.), Emergent Urbansim (pp. 91-99). London & New York: Routledge.
Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
Mouffe, C. (2005). On the Political (Thinking in Action). London and New York: Routledge.
Nagel, T. (1986). The View from Nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.
Norberg-Schulz, C. (2003). Architecture: Meaning and Place (V. Norouz Borazjani, Trans.). Tehran: Jan-e Jahan.
Nussbaum, M. (1997). Cultivating Humanity: a Classical Defense of Reform in Liberal Education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Punter, J. V. (1991). Participation in the design of urban space. Landscape Design, (200), 24-27.
Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness. London: Pion Limited.
Salisbury, L. (2006). Michel Serres: science, fiction, and the shape of relation, Technoculture and Science Fiction, 33(1), 30-52
Schmitt, C. (2016). The Concept of the Political (Y. Jeyrani & R. Namazi, Trans.). Tehran: Ghoghnous.
Serres, M. (1995). Genesis (G. James & J. Nielson, Trans.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Serres, M. (2007). The Parasite. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Soja. E. (1996). Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Oxford: Blackwell.
Southworth, M. & Ruggeri, D. (2011). Beyond placeless-ness: Place identity and the global city. In T. Banerjee & A. Loukaitou-Sideris (Eds.), Companion to Urban Design (pp. 495-509). London: Routledge.
Southworth, M. & Ruggeri, D. (2015). Beyond placeless-ness: place identity and the global city (N. Pourmohammadreza, Trans.). In T. Banerjee & A. Loukaitou-Sideris (Eds.), Companion to Urban Design (pp.783-802). Tehran: Tahan.
Tavakkolimehr, N. (2017, August 26). Dar jostojou-ye hoviyat dar namakan-ha-ye shahr [Exploration of identity in urban non-places]. Shargh. p. 11.
Thrift, N. (1996). Spatial Formations. London: Sage Publications.
Torkameh, A. (2014). Yaddasht-e motarjem [Translator’s note] to Dialectical Materialism by Henri Lefebvre (A. Torkameh, Trans.). Tehran: Nista.
Zekavat, K. & Dehghan Sadat, Y. (2016). Dimension to develop quality in public realm and a management model for creation of places. Armanshahr, (17), 215-224.
The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar
Volume 17, Issue 90
November 2020
Pages 5-18

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics